490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21491004)
1. Correction of a severe skeletal Class II occlusion with a fixed functional appliance anchored on mini-implants: a patient report.
Gandedkar NH; Revankar AV; Ganeshkar SV
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 21491004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-implants for en masse intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth in a severe Class II division 2 malocclusion.
Upadhyay M; Nagaraj K; Yadav S; Saxena R
J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 35(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18525071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. En-masse retraction dependent on a temporary skeletal anchorage device without posterior bonding or banding in an adult with severe bidentoalveolar protrusion: seven years posttreatment.
Chung KR; Jeong DM; Kim SH; Ko YI; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):484-94. PubMed ID: 22464531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A segmented appliance for space closure followed by Invisalign and fixed appliances.
Uribe F; Cutrera A; Nanda R
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 22299111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient.
Kim TW; Kim H; Lee SJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 17110268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Uribe F; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21867432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Report of a patient with a Class II occlusion using the Begg technique to move the first molars distally.
Uslu O; Erdem D
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 19885429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the HERBST appliance with atypical extractions in the lower dental arch.
Filho LC; Siqueira DF; de Castro RC; Comparim R; Blanco MR; de Almeida Cardoso M
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(4):19-24. PubMed ID: 24640071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timely relocation of mini-implants for uninterrupted full-arch distalization.
Chung KR; Choo H; Kim SH; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):839-49. PubMed ID: 21130344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.
Altuğ-Ataç AT; Dalcı ÖN; Memikoğlu UT
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class III malocclusion treated with distalization of the mandibular dentition with miniscrew anchorage: A 2-year follow-up.
Chen K; Cao Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):1043-53. PubMed ID: 26672711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An esthetic treatment outcome of orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in class II treatment: a cephalometric study.
Kabbur KJ; Hemanth M; Patil GS; Sathyadeep V; Shamnur N; Harieesha KB; Praveen GR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):602-6. PubMed ID: 23250160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anchorage loss due to Herbst mechanics-preventable through miniscrews?
Bremen Jv; Ludwig B; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 25452627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-implant-anchored Mesialslider for simultaneous mesialisation and intrusion of upper molars in an anterior open bite case: a three-year follow-up.
Wilmes B; Katyal V; Willmann J; Stocker B; Drescher D
Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 26219151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Orthopedic treatment of dento-skeletal Class II by the association minivis + Forsus(TM): a clinical case].
Pujol P
Orthod Fr; 2014 Jun; 85(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 24923219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini-implant anchorage for a skeletal class II malocclusion with missing mandibular incisors: a case report.
Nagaraj K; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 18575310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
