113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21491137)
1. A brief history of field trials of the DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilias.
Blanchard R
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Oct; 40(5):861-2. PubMed ID: 21491137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining paraphilia in DSM-5: do not disregard grammar.
Hinderliter AC
J Sex Marital Ther; 2011; 37(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 21218328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposals to add new paraphilias to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Edition 5 (DSM-5).
Franklin K
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):137. PubMed ID: 21389175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Forensic and diagnostic concerns arising from the proposed DSM-5 criteria for sexual paraphilic disorder.
Fedoroff JP
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 21653271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in terminology for sexual disorders in DSM-IV.
Schmidt CW
Psychiatr Med; 1992; 10(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 1615163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex, immorality, and mental disorders.
Gert B; Culver CM
J Med Philos; 2009 Oct; 34(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 19690325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical appraisals of the proposed DSM-5 paraphilia diagnoses.
Krueger RB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(2):237. PubMed ID: 21653270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sampling Extreme Groups Invalidates Research on the Paraphilias: Implications for DSM-5 and Sex Offender Risk Assessments.
Wollert R; Cramer E
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):554-65. PubMed ID: 21796673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility.
Wakefield JC
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21531463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The DSM diagnostic criteria for exhibitionism, voyeurism, and frotteurism.
Långström N
Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Apr; 39(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 19924524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hebephilia is not a mental disorder in DSM-IV-TR and should not become one in DSM-5.
Frances A; First MB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 21389170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paraphilic diagnoses in DSM-5.
Krueger RB; Kaplan MS
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2012; 49(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23585461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Issues for DSM-V: DSM-V should include a conceptual issues work group.
Kendler KS; Appelbaum PS; Bell CC; Fulford KW; Ghaemi SN; Schaffner KF; Waterman GS; First MB; Sadler JZ
Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 18245185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. For DSM-V, it's the "disorder threshold," stupid.
Regier DA; Narrow WE; Rae DS
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 61(10):1051; author reply 1051-2. PubMed ID: 15466679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moving toward DSM-5: the field trials.
Kraemer HC; Kupfer DJ; Narrow WE; Clarke DE; Regier DA
Am J Psychiatry; 2010 Oct; 167(10):1158-60. PubMed ID: 20889660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Problems with ascertainment.
Moser C
Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1225-7. PubMed ID: 20652734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Normative warrant in diagnostic criteria: the case of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders.
Sadler JZ; Fulford B
J Pers Disord; 2006 Apr; 20(2):170-80; discussion 181-5. PubMed ID: 16643120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Critical evaluation of the first draft of DSM-V].
Frances A
Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Feb; 7(282):398, 400-1. PubMed ID: 21416868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A response to Lawrence's (2009) erotic target location errors.
Moser C
J Sex Res; 2009; 46(5):383-4; author reply 385-6. PubMed ID: 19787535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Issues for DSM-V: the limitations of field trials: a lesson from DSM-IV.
Frances A
Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Dec; 166(12):1322. PubMed ID: 19952082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
