139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21492241)
1. Side-by-side comparison of an open-chamber (TM 300) and a closed-chamber (Vapometer™) transepidermal water loss meter.
Steiner M; Aikman-Green S; Prescott GJ; Dick FD
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 21492241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A closed unventilated chamber for the measurement of transepidermal water loss.
Nuutinen J; Alanen E; Autio P; Lahtinen MR; Harvima I; Lahtinen T
Skin Res Technol; 2003 May; 9(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 12709124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the VapoMeter, a closed unventilated chamber system to assess transepidermal water loss vs. the open chamber Tewameter.
De Paepe K; Houben E; Adam R; Wiesemann F; Rogiers V
Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 15691261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of closed chamber and open chamber evaporimetry.
Cohen JC; Hartman DG; Garofalo MJ; Basehoar A; Raynor B; Ashbrenner E; Akin FJ
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 19152579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaporimetry in man.
Shah JH; Zhai H; Maibach HI
Skin Res Technol; 2005 Aug; 11(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 15998333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring transepidermal water loss: a comparative in vivo study of condenser-chamber, unventilated-chamber and open-chamber systems.
Farahmand S; Tien L; Hui X; Maibach HI
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Nov; 15(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 19832948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a hand-held evaporimeter (VapoMeter) for the measurement of transepidermal water loss in healthy dogs.
Lau-Gillard PJ; Hill PB; Chesney CJ; Budleigh C; Immonen A
Vet Dermatol; 2010 Apr; 21(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 19961567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models.
Fluhr JW; Feingold KR; Elias PM
Exp Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 15(7):483-92. PubMed ID: 16761956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Closed-chamber transepidermal water loss measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance.
Imhof RE; De Jesus ME; Xiao P; Ciortea LI; Berg EP
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Apr; 31(2):97-118. PubMed ID: 19175433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tape-stripping method in man: comparison of evaporimetric methods.
Zhai H; Dika E; Goldovsky M; Maibach HI
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 17374064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A portable device using a closed chamber system for measuring transepidermal water loss: comparison with the conventional method.
Tagami H; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi K
Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 12005122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transepidermal Water Loss in Neonates: Baseline Values Using a Closed-Chamber System.
Mathanda TR; M Bhat R; Hegde P; Anand S
Pediatr Dermatol; 2016; 33(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 26758089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the measuring efficacy of transepidermal water loss of a reasonably priced, portable closed-chamber system device H4500 with that of rather expensive, conventional devices such as Tewameter
Kikuchi K; Asano M; Tagami H; Kato M; Aiba S
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Nov; 23(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 28517733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transepidermal water loss in cats: comparison of three differently clipped sites to assess the influence of hair coat on transepidermal water loss values.
Momota Y; Shimada K; Takami A; Akaogi H; Takasaki M; Mimura K; Azakami D; Ishioka K; Nakamura Y; Sako T
Vet Dermatol; 2013 Aug; 24(4):450-2, e100-1. PubMed ID: 23789740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two series of non-invasive instruments used for the skin physiological properties measurements: the DermaLab
Hua W; Fan LM; Dai R; Luan M; Xie H; Li AQ; Li L
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Feb; 23(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 27637867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Approaches for optimizing the calibration standard of Tewameter TM 300.
Miteva M; Richter S; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 15(11):904-12. PubMed ID: 17002688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences.
Rogiers V;
Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol; 2001; 14(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 11316970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in cats with experimental skin barrier dysfunction using a closed chamber system.
Momota Y; Shimada K; Gin A; Matsubara T; Azakami D; Ishioka K; Nakamura Y; Sako T
Vet Dermatol; 2016 Oct; 27(5):428-e110. PubMed ID: 27492205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Newborn transepidermal water loss values: a reference dataset.
Kelleher MM; O'Carroll M; Gallagher A; Murray DM; Dunn Galvin A; Irvine AD; Hourihane JO
Pediatr Dermatol; 2013; 30(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 23458265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transepidermal water loss in erythrodermic patients of various aetiologies.
Mohd Noor N; Hussein SH
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Aug; 19(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 23530728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
