116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21493173)
1. Does the way maternity care is provided affect maternal and neonatal outcomes for young women? A review of the research literature.
Allen J; Gamble J; Stapleton H; Kildea S
Women Birth; 2012 Jun; 25(2):54-63. PubMed ID: 21493173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial.
Tracy SK; Hartz DL; Tracy MB; Allen J; Forti A; Hall B; White J; Lainchbury A; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Bisits A; Homer C; Foureur M; Welsh A; Kildea S
Lancet; 2013 Nov; 382(9906):1723-32. PubMed ID: 24050808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does model of maternity care make a difference to birth outcomes for young women? A retrospective cohort study.
Allen J; Gibbons K; Beckmann M; Tracy M; Stapleton H; Kildea S
Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 Aug; 52(8):1332-42. PubMed ID: 25952336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Number of antenatal visits and women's opinion.
Hildingsson I; Rådestad I; Waldenström U
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Mar; 84(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 15715532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The health consequences of teenage fertility.
Makinson C
Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(3):132-9. PubMed ID: 2431924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
Farquhar M; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Todd C
Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How optimal caseload midwifery can modify predictors for preterm birth in young women: Integrated findings from a mixed methods study.
Allen J; Kildea S; Stapleton H
Midwifery; 2016 Oct; 41():30-38. PubMed ID: 27498186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving antenatal care for pregnant adolescents in southern Malawi.
Brabin L; Verhoeff FH; Kazembe P; Brabin BJ; Chimsuku L; Broadhead R
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Apr; 77(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 9598948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Models of antenatal care and obstetric outcomes in Sydney South West.
Bai J; Gyaneshwar R; Bauman A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):454-61. PubMed ID: 19032659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Teenage antenatal clinics may reduce the rate of preterm birth: a prospective study.
Quinlivan JA; Evans SF
BJOG; 2004 Jun; 111(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 15198785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives' antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: a randomised controlled trial.
Gu C; Wu X; Ding Y; Zhu X; Zhang Z
Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1689-97. PubMed ID: 23735597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial.
McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Lumley J; Farrell T; Oats J; Gold L; Waldenström U; Albers L; Biro MA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Aug; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18680606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Demographic patterns, attitudes and practices of women attending an antenatal clinic in rural Nepal.
Kirkpatrick M; Lamichhane S
J Inst Med; 1990; 12(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 12283775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of maternal human immunodeficiency virus infection on pregnancy and birth outcomes in Pune, India.
Patil S; Bhosale R; Sambarey P; Gupte N; Suryavanshi N; Sastry J; Bollinger RC; Gupta A; Shankar A
AIDS Care; 2011 Dec; 23(12):1562-9. PubMed ID: 21711178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Booked and unbooked mothers delivering at Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe: a comparison of maternal characteristics and foetal outcome.
Fawcus SR; Crowther CA; Van Baelen P; Marumahoko J
Cent Afr J Med; 1992 Oct; 38(10):402-8. PubMed ID: 1308714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perinatal outcomes and risk factors of Turkish adolescent mothers.
Keskinoglu P; Bilgic N; Picakciefe M; Giray H; Karakus N; Gunay T
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 20(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 17289512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of a dedicated antenatal clinic on the obstetric and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women.
Das S; Dhulkotia JS; Brook J; Amu O
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jul; 27(5):464-6. PubMed ID: 17701790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
