These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21493881)

  • 1. Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations.
    Tomasi C; Bressan E; Corazza B; Mazzoleni S; Stellini E; Lith A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 May; 40(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 21493881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study.
    Fernandes TM; Adamczyk J; Poleti ML; Henriques JF; Friedland B; Garib DG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25004053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography.
    Santos Tde S; Gomes AC; de Melo DG; Melo AR; Cavalcante JR; de Araújo LC; Travassos RM; Martins-Filho PR; Piva MR; Silva HF
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23257480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
    Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
    Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital method for quantification of circumferential periodontal bone level using cone beam CT.
    Fleiner J; Hannig C; Schulze D; Stricker A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 22431146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Pagin O; Moretti MR; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 25963719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.
    Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):856-64. PubMed ID: 21469969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Rangel FA; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Becking AG; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
    Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.