These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21493881)

  • 21. The validity of transverse intermaxillary analysis by traditional PA cephalometry compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Cheung G; Goonewardene MS; Islam SM; Murray K; Koong B
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 23785942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Han SS; Lee KM; Kim KD
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():808625. PubMed ID: 26579540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of CBCT in the diagnosis of dental asymmetry.
    Ruellas AC; Koerich L; Baratieri C; Mattos CT; Alves M; Brunetto D; Eidson L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 24945519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.
    Brown AA; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 19123719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Markic G; Müller L; Patcas R; Roos M; Lochbühler N; Peltomäki T; Karlo CA; Ullrich O; Kellenberger CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 25154725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs.
    Patcas R; Markic G; Müller L; Ullrich O; Peltomäki T; Kellenberger CJ; Karlo CA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):637-44. PubMed ID: 22554987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
    Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes.
    Torres MG; Campos PS; Segundo NP; Navarro M; Crusoé-Rebello I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22382754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated analysis of three-dimensional CBCT images taken in natural head position that combines facial profile processing and multiple deep-learning models.
    Ahn J; Nguyen TP; Kim YJ; Kim T; Yoon J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Nov; 226():107123. PubMed ID: 36156440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.
    Panmekiate S; Apinhasmit W; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Oct; 41(7):578-82. PubMed ID: 22499132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
    Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test-retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors.
    Lin HS; Chen YJ; Lu HL; Lu TW; Chen CC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 May; 16(1):62. PubMed ID: 28558778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
    Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.