These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21494398)

  • 1. Validation of stereophotogrammetry of the human torso.
    Lee J; Kawale M; Merchant FA; Weston J; Fingeret MC; Ladewig D; Reece GP; Crosby MA; Beahm EK; Markey MK
    Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2011 Feb; 5():15-25. PubMed ID: 21494398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated Identification of Fiducial Points on 3D Torso Images.
    Kawale MM; Reece GP; Crosby MA; Beahm EK; Fingeret MC; Markey MK; Merchant FA
    Biomed Eng Comput Biol; 2013; 5():57-68. PubMed ID: 25288903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computation of breast ptosis from 3D surface scans of the female torso.
    Li D; Cheong A; Reece GP; Crosby MA; Fingeret MC; Merchant FA
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Nov; 78():18-28. PubMed ID: 27643463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D Symmetry Measure Invariant to Subject Pose During Image Acquisition.
    Kawale M; Lee J; Leung SY; Fingeret MC; Reece GP; Crosby MA; Beahm EK; Markey MK; Merchant FA
    Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2011; 5():131-42. PubMed ID: 21792310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the 3dMDface system as a tool for soft tissue analysis.
    Hong C; Choi K; Kachroo Y; Kwon T; Nguyen A; McComb R; Moon W
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28643910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a passive stereophotogrammetry system for imaging of the breast: a geometric analysis.
    Catherwood T; McCaughan E; Greer E; Spence RA; McIntosh SA; Winder RJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):900-5. PubMed ID: 21382736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-view stereophotogrammetry for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Ju X; Henseler H; Peng MJ; Khambay BS; Ray AK; Ayoub AF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Mar; 54(2-3):475-84. PubMed ID: 26133282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of 3D Face-Scan images obtained by stereophotogrammetry and smartphone camera.
    Akan B; Akan E; Şahan AO; Kalak M
    Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):669-678. PubMed ID: 34544662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability, validity, and precision of an active stereophotogrammetry system for three-dimensional evaluation of the human torso.
    Paul SM; Chamberlin AP; Hatt C; Nayak AV; Danoff JV
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1337-42. PubMed ID: 19819750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring digit lengths with 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A comparison across methods.
    Gremba A; Weinberg SM
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jul; 30(4):e23133. PubMed ID: 29744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning.
    D'Ettorre G; Farronato M; Candida E; Quinzi V; Grippaudo C
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):358-363. PubMed ID: 35015071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital stereophotogrammetry as a new technique to quantify truncal deformity: a pilot study in persons with osteogenesis imperfecta.
    Gabor LR; Chamberlin AP; Levy E; Perry MB; Cintas H; Paul SM
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 90(10):844-50. PubMed ID: 21862911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Accuracy of Facial Models Fabricated Using Traditional and 3D Imaging Techniques.
    Lincoln KP; Sun AY; Prihoda TJ; Sutton AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 26381058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Picture perfect? Reliability of craniofacial anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Heike CL; Cunningham ML; Hing AV; Stuhaug E; Starr JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Oct; 124(4):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 19935311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems.
    Tzou CH; Artner NM; Pona I; Hold A; Placheta E; Kropatsch WG; Frey M
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 24529695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a Three-Dimensional Hand Model Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry: Assessment of Image Reproducibility.
    Hoevenaren IA; Meulstee J; Krikken E; Bergé SJ; Ulrich DJ; Maal TJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136710. PubMed ID: 26366860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Guo Y; Rokohl AC; Schaub F; Hou X; Liu J; Ruan Y; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 257(11):2517-2531. PubMed ID: 31407036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a new three-dimensional imaging system using comparative craniofacial anthropometry.
    Naini FB; Akram S; Kepinska J; Garagiola U; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 39(1):23. PubMed ID: 28894726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.