171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21494401)
1. Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases.
Kayar R; Civelek S; Cobanoglu M; Gungor O; Catal H; Emiroglu M
Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2011 Mar; 5():43-52. PubMed ID: 21494401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume.
Caruso MK; Guillot TS; Nguyen T; Greenway FL
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 16411159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Itsukage S; Sowa Y; Goto M; Taguchi T; Numajiri T
Eplasty; 2017; 17():e39. PubMed ID: 29308107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques.
Bulstrode N; Bellamy E; Shrotria S
Breast; 2001 Apr; 10(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 14965570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calculation of breast volumes from mammogram: Comparison of four separate equations relative to mastectomy specimen volumes.
Rostas JW; Bhutiani N; Crigger M; Crawford SMW; Hollenbach RB; Heidrich SR; Martin RCG; McMasters KM; Ajkay N
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 117(8):1848-1853. PubMed ID: 29790170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography with a fully automated breast volumetric software as a novel method for estimating the preoperative breast volume prior to mastectomy.
Kim JS; Bae K; Lee EJ; Bang M
Ann Surg Treat Res; 2021 Jun; 100(6):313-319. PubMed ID: 34136427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique.
Yip JM; Mouratova N; Jeffery RM; Veitch DE; Woodman RJ; Dean NR
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 68(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 21587046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D Breast Volume Estimation.
Gouveia PF; Oliveira HP; Monteiro JP; Teixeira JF; Silva NL; Pinto D; Mavioso C; Anacleto J; Martinho M; Duarte I; Cardoso JS; Cardoso F; Cardoso MJ
Eur Surg Res; 2022; 63(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 34038908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cosmetic outcome and percentage of breast volume excision in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.
Chan SW; Cheung PS; Lam SH
World J Surg; 2010 Jul; 34(7):1447-52. PubMed ID: 19936979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Study of the Relation Between Mastectomy Specimen Weight and Volume With Implant Size in Oncoplastic Reconstruction.
Wazir U; El Hage Chehade H; Choy C; Kasem A; Mokbel K
In Vivo; 2019; 33(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30587612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparative Retrospective Analysis of Complications After Oncoplastic Breast Reduction and Breast Reduction for Benign Macromastia: Are These Procedures Equally Safe?
Imahiyerobo TA; Pharmer LA; Swistel AJ; Talmor M
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 75(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 24691307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic segmentation of MRI in prospective breast volume evaluation: Comparison of different assessments for immediate breast reconstruction.
Chan KK; Feng CJ; Shih ZC; Tsai YF; Huang CC; Lin YS; Hsiao FY; Yu WC; Tseng LM; Perng CK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Jun; 95():273-282. PubMed ID: 38943699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost-utility analysis comparing large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to mastectomy with single stage implant reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer.
Asban A; Homsy C; Chen L; Fisher C; Losken A; Chatterjee A
Breast; 2018 Oct; 41():159-164. PubMed ID: 30099327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conversion from weight to volume of mastectomy specimen: Convenient equations.
Lee JH; Yeo CH; Kim T; Chung KJ; Lee SJ; Kang SH; Choi JE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Jun; 70(6):792-794. PubMed ID: 28408284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of analog and digitally evaluated volume of the female breast in reconstructive breast surgery. Validation of a noninvasive measurement method with 3D camera1.
Brebant V; Lemonnier L; Georgieva M; Anker A; Heine N; Seitz S; Frank K; Prantl L; Eigenberger A
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 85(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 36502309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application.
Westreich M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Aug; 100(2):468-79. PubMed ID: 9252618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative breast volume evaluation of one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using three-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold.
Chen K; Feng CJ; Ma H; Hsiao FY; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Huang LY; Yu WC; Perng CK
J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Sep; 82(9):732-739. PubMed ID: 31335631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Anthropometry: Values and Application in Breast Surgery for Vietnamese Women.
Le QH; Nguyen HC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Feb; 23(2):665-671. PubMed ID: 35225480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: Volume replacement vs. volume displacement.
Noguchi M; Yokoi-Noguchi M; Ohno Y; Morioka E; Nakano Y; Kosaka T; Kurita T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 42(7):926-34. PubMed ID: 26988623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging System in Breast Volume Estimation.
Kwong JW; Tijerina JD; Choi S; Luan A; Feng CL; Nguyen DH; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 May; 84(5S Suppl 4):S311-S317. PubMed ID: 32032116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
