These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21494922)

  • 1. Non-transient luminance changes do not capture attention.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G; Skarratt PA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1407-21. PubMed ID: 21494922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do new objects capture attention?
    Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isoluminant motion onset captures attention.
    Guo RM; Abrams RA; Moscovitch M; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 20601712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When do luminance changes capture attention?
    Spehar B; Owens C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):674-90. PubMed ID: 22259184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Luminosity--a perceptual "feature" of light-emitting objects?
    Correani A; Scott-Samuel NE; Leonards U
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3915-25. PubMed ID: 16765405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recovery from object substitution masking induced by transient suppression of visual motion processing: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Hirose N; Kihara K; Mima T; Ueki Y; Fukuyama H; Osaka N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1495-503. PubMed ID: 18085959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit perception and level of processing in object-substitution masking.
    Chen Z; Treisman A
    Psychol Sci; 2009 May; 20(5):560-7. PubMed ID: 19368699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of spatial competition between object-level representations of target and mask on object substitution masking.
    Guest D; Gellatly A; Pilling M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2528-41. PubMed ID: 21850544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The line motion illusion: the detection of counterchanging edge and surface contrast.
    Hock HS; Nichols DF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Aug; 36(4):781-96. PubMed ID: 20695699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of contrast polarity in paracontrast masking.
    Kafaligönül H; Breitmeyer BG; Ogmen H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1576-87. PubMed ID: 19801617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Glare adaptation for inhomogeneous glare distribution with respect to the dynamic components of the vision task].
    Carraro U
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 7780273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new object captures attention--but only when you know it's new.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 19429953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture with various distractor and target types.
    Chastain G; Cheal M
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):979-90. PubMed ID: 11578059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention?
    Gellatly A; Cole G; Blurton A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1609-24. PubMed ID: 10641313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An effect of contrast and luminance on visual representational momentum for location.
    Hubbard TL; Ruppel SE
    Perception; 2014; 43(8):754-66. PubMed ID: 25549506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.
    Franconeri SL; Simons DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):999-1010. PubMed ID: 14674628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.