252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21495007)
1. Microbial electricity generation via microfluidic flow control.
Li Z; Zhang Y; LeDuc PR; Gregory KB
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Sep; 108(9):2061-9. PubMed ID: 21495007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.
Nevin KP; Richter H; Covalla SF; Johnson JP; Woodard TL; Orloff AL; Jia H; Zhang M; Lovley DR
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 10(10):2505-14. PubMed ID: 18564184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 1.5 microL microbial fuel cell for on-chip bioelectricity generation.
Qian F; Baum M; Gu Q; Morse DE
Lab Chip; 2009 Nov; 9(21):3076-81. PubMed ID: 19823722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of Shewanella japonica for microbial fuel cells.
Biffinger JC; Fitzgerald LA; Ray R; Little BJ; Lizewski SE; Petersen ER; Ringeisen BR; Sanders WC; Sheehan PE; Pietron JJ; Baldwin JW; Nadeau LJ; Johnson GR; Ribbens M; Finkel SE; Nealson KH
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):290-7. PubMed ID: 20663660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells.
Yi H; Nevin KP; Kim BC; Franks AE; Klimes A; Tender LM; Lovley DR
Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Aug; 24(12):3498-503. PubMed ID: 19487117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential biofilms characteristics of Shewanella decolorationis microbial fuel cells under open and closed circuit conditions.
Yang Y; Sun G; Guo J; Xu M
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(14):7093-8. PubMed ID: 21571526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode-respiring bacteria.
Torres CI; Kato Marcus A; Rittmann BE
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Aug; 100(5):872-81. PubMed ID: 18551519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An innovative miniature microbial fuel cell fabricated using photolithography.
Chen YP; Zhao Y; Qiu KQ; Chu J; Lu R; Sun M; Liu XW; Sheng GP; Yu HQ; Chen J; Li WJ; Liu G; Tian YC; Xiong Y
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Feb; 26(6):2841-6. PubMed ID: 21169010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A gold-sputtered carbon paper as an anode for improved electricity generation from a microbial fuel cell inoculated with Shewanella oneidensis MR-1.
Sun M; Zhang F; Tong ZH; Sheng GP; Chen YZ; Zhao Y; Chen YP; Zhou SY; Liu G; Tian YC; Yu HQ
Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Oct; 26(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 20801013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of formation of biofilms and chemical scale on the cathode electrode on the performance of a continuous two-chamber microbial fuel cell.
Chung K; Fujiki I; Okabe S
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):355-60. PubMed ID: 20923722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ferric iron enhances electricity generation by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 in MFCs.
Wu D; Xing D; Lu L; Wei M; Liu B; Ren N
Bioresour Technol; 2013 May; 135():630-4. PubMed ID: 23127834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of a microbial fuel cell depends strongly on anode geometry: a multidimensional modeling study.
Merkey BV; Chopp DL
Bull Math Biol; 2012 Apr; 74(4):834-57. PubMed ID: 22015479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biofilm enhanced miniature microbial fuel cell using Shewanella oneidensis DSP10 and oxygen reduction cathodes.
Biffinger JC; Pietron J; Ray R; Little B; Ringeisen BR
Biosens Bioelectron; 2007 Mar; 22(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 16939710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Graphite anode surface modification with controlled reduction of specific aryl diazonium salts for improved microbial fuel cells power output.
Picot M; Lapinsonnière L; Rothballer M; Barrière F
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Oct; 28(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 21803564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electricity production and microbial biofilm characterization in cellulose-fed microbial fuel cells.
Ren Z; Steinberg LM; Regan JM
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 18725730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of surface roughness, biofilm coverage and biofilm structure on the electrochemical efficiency of microbial cathodes.
Pons L; Délia ML; Bergel A
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):2678-83. PubMed ID: 21131196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial-enzymatic-hybrid biological fuel cell with optimized growth conditions for Shewanella oneidensis DSP-10.
Roy JN; Luckarift HR; Sizemore SR; Farrington KE; Lau C; Johnson GR; Atanassov P
Enzyme Microb Technol; 2013 Jul; 53(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 23769313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electricity generation from cysteine in a microbial fuel cell.
Logan BE; Murano C; Scott K; Gray ND; Head IM
Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(5):942-52. PubMed ID: 15743641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of Enterobacter aerogenes fuel cells: from in situ biohydrogen oxidization to direct electroactive biofilm.
Zhuang L; Zhou S; Yuan Y; Liu T; Wu Z; Cheng J
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 20598528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Solar energy powered microbial fuel cell with a reversible bioelectrode.
Strik DP; Hamelers HV; Buisman CJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):532-7. PubMed ID: 19961218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
