These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21495059)

  • 21. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Role of performance metrics in breast screening imaging - where are we and where should we be?
    Cohen SL; Blanks RG; Jenkins J; Kearins O
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):381-388. PubMed ID: 29395223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frequency and diagnostic outcome of bilateral recall at screening mammography.
    Lameijer JRC; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 32621785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J; Huynh M
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correcting for bias in the selection and validation of informative diagnostic tests.
    Robertson DS; Prevost AT; Bowden J
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1417-37. PubMed ID: 25645331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
    Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extending Hui-Walter framework to correlated outcomes with application to diagnosis tests of an eye disease among premature infants.
    Liu YL; Ying GS; Quinn GE; Zhou XH; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):433-448. PubMed ID: 34859902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Review of Breast Density Implications and Breast Cancer Screening.
    Lian J; Li K
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32334975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Towards evidence-based follow-up intervals for breast cancer survivors: Estimates of the preclinical detectable phase of contralateral second breast cancer.
    Aarts AMWM; Duffy SW; Geurts SME; Vulkan DP; Houssami N; Zappa M; Nagtegaal ID; Verbeek ALM; Broeders MJM
    Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():70-74. PubMed ID: 30884341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrasound and Clinical Characteristics of False-negative Results in Mammography Screening of Dense Breasts.
    Pu H; Peng J; Xu F; Liu N; Wang F; Huang X; Jia Y
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 32229176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic accuracy measures when comparing multiple screening tests - an application to the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study.
    Day E; Eldred-Evans D; Prevost AT; Ahmed HU; Fiorentino F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):70. PubMed ID: 35300611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.
    Jackson SL; Taplin SH; Sickles EA; Abraham L; Barlow WE; Carney PA; Geller B; Berns EA; Cutter GR; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jun; 101(11):814-27. PubMed ID: 19470953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to diagnostic mammographic projections (including magnification) among women recalled at screening mammography: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).
    Canelo-Aybar C; Carrera L; Beltrán J; Posso M; Rigau D; Lebeau A; Gräwingholt A; Castells X; Langendam M; Pérez E; Giorgi Rossi P; Van Engen R; Parmelli E; Saz-Parkinson Z; Alonso-Coello P
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(7):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 33675147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.
    Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
    Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
    Berg WA; Blume JD; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB; Lehrer D; Böhm-Vélez M; Pisano ED; Jong RA; Evans WP; Morton MJ; Mahoney MC; Larsen LH; Barr RG; Farria DM; Marques HS; Boparai K;
    JAMA; 2008 May; 299(18):2151-63. PubMed ID: 18477782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.
    Théberge I; Chang SL; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Guertin MH; Pelletier E; Brisson J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Mar; 106(3):djt461. PubMed ID: 24598715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Performance of record linkage for cancer registry data linked with mammography screening data].
    Giersiepen K; Bachteler T; Gramlich T; Reiher J; Schubert B; Novopashenny I; Schnell R
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Jul; 53(7):740-7. PubMed ID: 20652484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
    Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.