938 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21495062)
21. Hierarchical priors for bias parameters in Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR; Richardson S
Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 22253142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What random assignment does and does not do.
Krause MS; Howard KI
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Forbes AB; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5143-55. PubMed ID: 18613226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of statistical methods for analysing survival data in the presence of non-random compliance.
Odondi L; McNamee R
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2994-3003. PubMed ID: 20963732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Time-dependent confounding in the estimation of treatment effects in randomised trials with multimodal therapies--an illustration of the problem of time-dependent confounding by causal graphs].
Zietemann VD; Schuster T; Duell TH
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jan; 77(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24203687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects.
Schmoor C; Caputo A; Schumacher M
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(9):1120-9. PubMed ID: 18334500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.
Klungel OH; Martens EP; Psaty BM; Grobbee DE; Sullivan SD; Stricker BH; Leufkens HG; de Boer A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 15617947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.
Wang L; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S
Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 36377509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimating adjusted NNTs in randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study.
Bender R; Vervölgyi V
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 20624484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis approaches to address treatment nonadherence in pragmatic trials with point-treatment settings: a simulation study.
Hossain MB; Mosquera L; Karim ME
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):46. PubMed ID: 35172746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An introduction to instrumental variables--part 2: Mendelian randomisation.
Bennett DA
Neuroepidemiology; 2010; 35(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 21042034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Instrumental variable analysis for cost outcome: Application to the effect of primary care visit on medical cost among low-income adults.
Gao D; Hu J; Bradley CJ; Yang F
Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(24):4349-4376. PubMed ID: 37828812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using the instrumental variables estimator to analyze noninferiority trials with noncompliance.
Kim MY
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):745-58. PubMed ID: 20496203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
McGuinness MB; Kasza J; Karahalios A; Guymer RH; Finger RP; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
