942 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21495062)
41. Instrumental variable approach for estimating a causal hazard ratio: application to the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on breast cancer patients.
Yang F; Cheng J; Huo D
Obs Stud; 2019; 5():141-162. PubMed ID: 34223564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prediction of an outcome using trajectories estimated from a linear mixed model.
Maruyama N; Takahashi F; Takeuchi M
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 20183443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. On the conditional logistic estimator in two-arm experimental studies with non-compliance and before-after binary outcomes.
Bartolucci F
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(13):1411-29. PubMed ID: 20209479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A simulation-based evaluation of methods to estimate the impact of an adverse event on hospital length of stay.
Samore MH; Shen S; Greene T; Stoddard G; Sauer B; Shinogle J; Nebeker J; Harbarth S
Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S108-15. PubMed ID: 17909368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Some cautions on the use of instrumental variables estimators in outcomes research: how bias in instrumental variables estimators is affected by instrument strength, instrument contamination, and sample size.
Crown WH; Henk HJ; Vanness DJ
Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1078-84. PubMed ID: 22152177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
Frank Liu G; Zhan X
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Occupational exposures and lung cancer: adjustment for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
Richardson DB
Epidemiology; 2010 Mar; 21(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 20081541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
Qu Y; Lipkovich I
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
Hong G
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
Hogan JW; Lancaster T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Bounding the bias of unmeasured factors with confounding and effect-modifying potentials.
Lee WC
Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(9):1007-17. PubMed ID: 21472760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
Villar J; Carroli G
Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Confounding in health research.
Greenland S; Morgenstern H
Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quantification of bias in direct effects estimates due to different types of measurement error in the mediator.
le Cessie S; Debeij J; Rosendaal FR; Cannegieter SC; Vandenbroucke JP
Epidemiology; 2012 Jul; 23(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 22526092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
