These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21495577)
1. The difficulty of doing business with Stark in an ever-changing and overly complex regulatory environment: after twenty years, where are we heading? Wagner IH Ann Health Law; 2010; 19(1 Spec No):241-7. PubMed ID: 21495577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stark regulation: a historical and current review of the self-referral laws. Kolber MJ HEC Forum; 2006 Mar; 18(1):61-84. PubMed ID: 17076130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage? Manchikanti L; McMahon EB Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AVOIDING SELF-REFERRAL: UNDERSTANDING THE STARK LAWS. Wool HS; Barrett D Med Econ; 2015 Apr; 92(7):40-1. PubMed ID: 26298996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Final phase of the Stark regulations takes effect: how we got here. Edwards C Bull Am Coll Surg; 2008 Feb; 93(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 18350995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The new Stark Phase II rules. Harris JA Bull Am Coll Surg; 2004 Jun; 89(6):8-11. PubMed ID: 18435134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers? Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stark revisions arrive. Docs await CMS referral changes--whatever they are. Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):8-9. PubMed ID: 17960699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Maryland self-referral law: history and implications. Quadri R; Rekhi SS; Zeman RK; Blumberg A; Tu RK J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Aug; 11(8):771-6. PubMed ID: 25087988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Will relaxing Stark bind you tighter? Terry K Med Econ; 2006 Feb; 83(3):40-3. PubMed ID: 16506627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New Stark Phase III Regulations: The Impact and Changes. Travis NL; Wool HS; Finnegan JH J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 18242531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Buyer beware: complying with amended stark and anti-kickback regulations. Klein SR; Fox SJ J Healthc Inf Manag; 2008; 22(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 19266987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. AM last page. History of medical licensure and regulation. Johnson D; Gerald A Acad Med; 2014 Jun; 89(6):953. PubMed ID: 24871249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stark III: refinement not revolution (part 1). Gosfield AG Fam Pract Manag; 2008 Mar; 15(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 18422263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stark rules. Purchases that pass muster. Terry K Med Econ; 2006 Dec; 83(24):44-6, 49. PubMed ID: 17249392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of the new Stark Phase II regulations. Siegel S Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Jun; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 15250190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. CMS shines up its 'shoes'. Stark revisions ease tensions on self-referrals. Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2008 Aug; 38(34):17. PubMed ID: 18800481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Stark Law: boon or boondoggle? An analysis of the prohibition on physician self-referrals. Wales SD Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():1-28. PubMed ID: 16514757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulations. Federal eyes trained on self-referral rules. Taylor M Hosp Health Netw; 2007 Oct; 81(10):12, 14. PubMed ID: 17977243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]