144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21497033)
1. Can Hounsfield unit values of the cortex and papillae determined by computed tomography demonstrate the possibility of kidney stone formation?
Baran I; Voyvoda N; Tokgöz Ö; Tokgöz H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1446-9. PubMed ID: 21497033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in computed tomography density of the renal papillae of stone formers and non-stone-formers: a pilot study.
Eisner BH; Iqbal A; Namasivayam S; Catalano O; Kambadakone A; Dretler SP; Sahani DV
J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2207-10. PubMed ID: 18831676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Renal papillary attenuation differences between primary and recurrent idiopathic calcium stone disease patients.
Cakiroglu B; Eyyupoglu SE; Tas T; Esen T; Acar O; Aksoy SH
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2014 Jun; 66(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 24988201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hounsfield density of renal papillae in stone formers: analysis based on stone composition.
Deshmukh S; Kambadakone A; Sahani DV; Eisner BH
J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1560-3. PubMed ID: 25444988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Randall's plaque theory using unenhanced abdominal computed tomography.
Ciudin A; Luque Galvez MP; Salvador Izquierdo R; Diaconu MG; de Castro AF; Constantin V; Alvarez-Vijande JR; Nicolau C; Alcaraz Asensio A
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):246-9. PubMed ID: 23374769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased renal papillary density in kidney stone formers detectable by CT scan is a potential marker of stone risk, but is unrelated to underlying hypercalciuria.
Shavit L; Girfoglio D; Kirkham A; Allen D; Ferraro PM; Moochhala S; Unwin R
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 27023714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unenhanced computed tomography findings of renal papillae in patients with a ureteral stone.
Serter S; Sahin E; Yildirim UM; Arslan M; Karakose A
Clin Invest Med; 2016 Dec; 39(6):27518. PubMed ID: 27917808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective evaluation of Randall's plaque theory of nephrolithiasis with CT attenuation values.
Bhuskute NM; Yap WW; Wah TM
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):470-2. PubMed ID: 18947952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evolution of CT diagnosed papillae tip microcalcifications: can we predict the development of stones?
Ciudin A; Luque MP; Salvador R; Diaconu MG; Franco A; Collado-Belvis A; Sanchez J; Constantin V; Alvarez-Vijande R; Nicolau C; Alcaraz A
J Endourol; 2014 Aug; 28(8):1016-21. PubMed ID: 24735416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dense renal papillae: a quantitative study using computed tomography.
Dixon AK; Ashford NS; Sherwood T
Nephron; 1988; 49(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 3412547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominal computed tomography--a new tool for predicting recurrent stone disease.
Ciudin A; Luque MP; Salvador R; Diaconu MG; Franco A; Constantin V; Alvarez-Vijande R; Nicolau C; Alcaraz A
J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 23668633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Bandi G; Meiners RJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nakada SY
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 19007365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do the variations in renal pelvic angles play a role in the formation of renal stone? A computed tomography study.
Sanal B; Korkmaz M; Can F; Aras B; Buyukkaya A
Ren Fail; 2015; 37(9):1448-51. PubMed ID: 26338289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of pelvicalyceal system anatomy on minimally invasive treatments of patients with renal calculi.
van Zanten P; Weltings S; Roshani H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Apr; 45(4):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 31676921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?
Madbouly K; Sheir KZ; Elsobky E
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1415-8. PubMed ID: 11342888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network.
Poulakis V; Dahm P; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Remplik J; Becht E
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1250-6. PubMed ID: 12629337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kidney stone size and hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children.
El-Assmy A; El-Nahas AR; Abou-El-Ghar ME; Awad BA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):880-4. PubMed ID: 23395121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.
Ouzaid I; Al-qahtani S; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Fernandez P; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Ravery V
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E438-42. PubMed ID: 22372937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional evaluation of perirenal fat volume in patients with nephrolithiasis.
Lama DJ; Safiullah S; Yang A; Okhunov Z; Landman J; Clayman RV
Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):535-541. PubMed ID: 29500620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
