109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21497791)
1. Comparing two types of engineering visualizations: task-related manipulations matter.
Cölln MC; Kusch K; Helmert JR; Kohler P; Velichkovsky BM; Pannasch S
Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 21497791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing 2D vector field visualization methods: a user study.
Laidlaw DH; Kirby RM; Jackson CD; Davidson JS; Miller TS; da Silva M; Warren WH; Tarr MJ
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2005; 11(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 15631129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual signatures in video visualization.
Chen M; Botchen RP; Hashim RR; Weiskopf D; Ertl T; Thornton IM
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(5):1093-100. PubMed ID: 17080839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing eye movements to detected vs. undetected target stimuli in an Identity Search task.
Jacob M; Hochstein S
J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):20.1-16. PubMed ID: 19757898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual and memory search in complex environments: determinants of eye movements and search performance.
Huestegge L; Radach R
Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1009-27. PubMed ID: 22725621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid resumption of interrupted search is independent of age-related improvements in visual search.
Lleras A; Porporino M; Burack JA; Enns JT
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 May; 109(1):58-72. PubMed ID: 21109252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: a study with chess experts.
Bilalić M; Langner R; Erb M; Grodd W
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):728-42. PubMed ID: 21038986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of static and dynamic visualization training approaches for users with different spatial abilities.
Froese ME; Tory M; Evans GW; Shrikhande K
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2810-7. PubMed ID: 24051848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What makes a visualization memorable?
Borkin MA; Vo AA; Bylinskii Z; Isola P; Sunkavalli S; Oliva A; Pfister H
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2306-15. PubMed ID: 24051797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. GazeAlyze: a MATLAB toolbox for the analysis of eye movement data.
Berger C; Winkels M; Lischke A; Höppner J
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):404-19. PubMed ID: 21898158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A model and framework for visualization exploration.
Jankun-Kelly TJ; Ma KL; Gertz M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007; 13(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17218751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance.
Ahmed A; Chandra S; Herasevich V; Gajic O; Pickering BW
Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1626-34. PubMed ID: 21478739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of user age and target-expansion methods on target-acquisition tasks using a mouse.
Lee D; Kwon S; Chung MK
Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 21658676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures.
Underwood G; Foulsham T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1931-49. PubMed ID: 16987782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces' sex: evidence from eye-tracking data.
Saether L; Van Belle W; Laeng B; Brennen T; Øvervoll M
Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2870-80. PubMed ID: 19733582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D visualization and stereographic techniques for medical research and education.
Rydmark M; Kling-Petersen T; Pascher R; Philip F
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():434-9. PubMed ID: 11317785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAVE and fishtank virtual-reality displays: a qualitative and quantitative comparison.
Demiralp C; Jackson CD; Karelitz DB; Zhang S; Laidlaw DH
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 16640246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence for the selective attention mechanism and dual-task interference.
Liu CC; Doong JL; Hsu CC; Huang WS; Jeng MC
Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 19166992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing.
Porter G; Tales A; Troscianko T; Wilcock G; Haworth J; Leonards U
Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):621-36. PubMed ID: 19591979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
