390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21498318)
1. Aliasing artifact depicted on ultrasound (US)-elastography for breast cystic lesions mimicking solid masses.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Kim SJ; Lyou CY; Choi HY
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21498318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pattern classification of ShearWave™ Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses.
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1069-75. PubMed ID: 22013011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.
Rahbar G; Sie AC; Hansen GC; Prince JS; Melany ML; Reynolds HE; Jackson VP; Sayre JW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):889-94. PubMed ID: 10580971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Typical and unusual sonoelastographic patterns of breast cystic lesions: impact on BI-RADS classification.
Chiorean AR; Duma MM; Dudea SM; Bolboaca S; Dumitriu D; Eniu D; Sfrangeu SA
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E138-E144. PubMed ID: 20972948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results.
Garra BS; Cespedes EI; Ophir J; Spratt SR; Zuurbier RA; Magnant CM; Pennanen MF
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 8988195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The utility of the "bull's-eye" artifact on breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsy rate.
Barr RG; Lackey AE
Ultrasound Q; 2011 Sep; 27(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 21873851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complex cystic and solid breast lesions: Diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound, strain imaging and point shear wave speed measurement.
Zhang Y; Xu HX; Zhao CK; Li XL; Bo XW; He YP; Liu BJ; Wang D; Ren WW
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 69(3):355-370. PubMed ID: 29660903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography.
Barr RG; Zhang Z
Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25426770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical office-based ultrasound of the breast.
Staren ED
Am Surg; 1995 Jul; 61(7):619-26; discussion 627. PubMed ID: 7793744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy.
Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Yu CP; Chang WC; Tung HJ; Lin WC; Tsai SH; Huang GS
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):447-54. PubMed ID: 22161618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required?
Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification: value in malignancy prediction for complex cystic and solid breast lesions.
Zhang Y; Zhao CK; Li XL; He YP; Ren WW; Zou CP; Du YW; Xu HX
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):7807. PubMed ID: 28798325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
