428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21498359)
21. Tumor size of breast invasive ductal cancer measured with contrast-enhanced ultrasound predicts regional lymph node metastasis and N stage.
Wang Z; Zhou Q; Liu J; Tang S; Liang X; Zhou Z; He Y; Peng H; Xiao Y
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):6985-91. PubMed ID: 25400785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using real-time contrast harmonic imaging in invasive breast cancer: comparison of enhancement dynamics with three different doses of contrast agent.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Tánczos E; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24445092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Wang XY; Kang LK; Lan CY
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 25118483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of transducers with different frequencies in breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using SonoVue as contrast agent.
Wang YM; Fan W; Zhang K; Zhang L; Tan Z; Ma R
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20151050. PubMed ID: 27143439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlation of real-time gray scale contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression for assessment of angiogenesis in breast lesions.
Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Xia JG; Zhu CX
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jun; 27(6):821-31. PubMed ID: 18499842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors.
Kim JA; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Jeong J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1450-6. PubMed ID: 21606313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound for pre-operative tumor size assessment in patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
van Esser S; Veldhuis WB; van Hillegersberg R; van Diest PJ; Stapper G; ElOuamari M; Borel Rinkes IH; Mali WP; van den Bosch MA
Cancer Imaging; 2007 May; 7(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17513187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Imaging Findings in Papillary Breast Lesions: An Analysis of Ductal Findings on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound.
Sarica O; Dokdok M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(4):542-551. PubMed ID: 29613991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Du J; Wang L; Wan CF; Hua J; Fang H; Chen J; Li FH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3890-9. PubMed ID: 23062280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Zhang B; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Yang M; Dai Q; Zhu QL; Gao P
Thyroid; 2010 Jan; 20(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20067379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Breast Masses: Adjunct Tool to Decrease the Number of False-Positive Biopsy Results.
Lee SC; Tchelepi H; Grant E; Desai B; Luo C; Groshen S; Hovanessian-Larsen L
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2259-2273. PubMed ID: 30597640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Wan C; Du J; Fang H; Li F; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e444-50. PubMed ID: 21612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Homogeneously enhancing breast lesions on contrast enhanced US: differential diagnosis by conventional and contrast enhanced US findings.
Fujimitsu R; Shimakura M; Urakawa H; Morita A; Shinagawa Y; Sakamoto K; Yoshimitsu K
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):508-14. PubMed ID: 27142527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The value of ultrasounds exam correlated with frozen section diagnosis in the breast tumors.
Venter A; Roşca E; Muţiu G; Pirte A; Roşca DM
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2010; 51(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 21103636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging.
Ricci P; Cantisani V; Ballesio L; Pagliara E; Sallusti E; Drudi FM; Trippa F; Calascibetta F; Erturk SM; Modesti M; Passariello R
Ultraschall Med; 2007 Feb; 28(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17304413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy.
Uhlig J; Fischer U; Surov A; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():9-16. PubMed ID: 29362157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intraductal mass on breast ultrasound: final outcomes and predictors of malignancy.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Yi A; Koo HR; Kim SJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):932-7. PubMed ID: 23521472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
