183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21498523)
1. Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.
Surti S; Scheuermann J; El Fakhri G; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Lim R; Abi-Hatem N; Moussallem E; Benard F; Mankoff D; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2011 May; 52(5):712-9. PubMed ID: 21498523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.
El Fakhri G; Surti S; Trott CM; Scheuermann J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2011 Mar; 52(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 21321265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.
Kadrmas DJ; Casey ME; Conti M; Jakoby BW; Lois C; Townsend DW
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1315-23. PubMed ID: 19617317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.
Kadrmas DJ; Casey ME; Black NF; Hamill JJ; Panin VY; Conti M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Apr; 28(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 19272998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ROC and localization ROC analyses of lesion detection in whole-body FDG PET: effects of acquisition mode, attenuation correction and reconstruction algorithm.
Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Hoh CK; Czernin J; Gambhir SS; Seltzer MA; Silverman DH; Qi J; Hsu C; Hoffman EJ
J Nucl Med; 1999 Dec; 40(12):2043-52. PubMed ID: 10616885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Numerical observer study of lesion detectability for a long axial field-of-view whole-body PET imager using the PennPET Explorer.
Viswanath V; Daube Witherspoon ME; Karp JS; Surti S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(3):035002. PubMed ID: 31816616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging.
Petibon Y; Huang C; Ouyang J; Reese TG; Li Q; Syrkina A; Chen YL; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042503. PubMed ID: 24694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.
Kadrmas DJ; Oktay MB; Casey ME; Hamill JJ
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2012 Oct; 59(5):1940-1947. PubMed ID: 23293380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of attenuation correction on lesion detection using a hybrid PET system.
Tocharoenchai C; Tsui BM; Frey EC; Wang WT
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Jan; 88(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 15960226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of accuracy and precision of lesion uptake measurements in human subjects with time-of-flight PET.
Daube-Witherspoon ME; Surti S; Perkins AE; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):602-7. PubMed ID: 24604909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact on reader performance for lesion-detection/ localization tasks of anatomical priors in SPECT reconstruction.
Lehovich A; Bruyant PP; Gifford HS; Schneider PB; Squires S; Licho R; Gindi G; King MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1459-67. PubMed ID: 19336295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.
Surti S; Karp JS; Popescu LM; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Werner M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):529-38. PubMed ID: 16689258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images.
Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Sayre J; Tai YC; Hoffman EJ
J Nucl Med; 2000 Apr; 41(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 10768578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
