These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21498579)

  • 1. Effects of computer system and vowel loading on measures of nasalance.
    Awan SN; Omlor K; Watts CR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1284-94. PubMed ID: 21498579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
    Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of nasal acceleration and nasalance across vowels.
    Thorp EB; Virnik BT; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1476-84. PubMed ID: 23838984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the Nasometer and the NasalView.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12498604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The differential influence of vowels and palatal covering on nasalance scores.
    Blanton A; Watterson T; Lewis K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Jan; 52(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 24805775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children.
    Park M; Baek WS; Lee E; Koh KS; Kim BK; Baek R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Feb; 67(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 24211114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T; Quint T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 11108528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Same noses, different nasalance scores: data from normal subjects and cleft palate speakers for three systems for nasalance analysis.
    Bressmann T; Klaiman P; Fischbach S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):163-70. PubMed ID: 16428233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nasalance scores for typical Irish English-speaking adults.
    Lee A; Browne U
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Dec; 38(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 22577843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
    Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers.
    El-Kassabi RM; Hassan S; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Alfaris A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Jul; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 24854781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of frequency range, vowel, dynamic loudness level, and gender on nasalance in amateur and classically trained singers.
    Jennings JJ; Kuehn DP
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 17084591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing stimulus length for clinical nasalance measures in Swedish.
    van Doorn J; Bergh I; Brunnegård K
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(4-5):355-61. PubMed ID: 18415735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children: Effects of age, vowel context, and stimulus length.
    Ha S; Cho SH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 26089139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of altered fundamental frequency on nasalance during vowel production by adult speakers at targeted sound pressure levels.
    Mandulak KC; Zajac DJ
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Jan; 46(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 19115791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasalance norms in Greek adults.
    Okalidou A; Karathanasi A; Grigoraki E
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Aug; 25(8):671-88. PubMed ID: 21668367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nasalance values for syllables produced by Brazilian Portuguese speakers.
    Marino VC; Cardoso VM; Ramos RG; Dutka Jde C
    Codas; 2016 Jul; 0():0. PubMed ID: 27383228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dialectical effects on nasalance: a multicenter, cross-continental study.
    Awan SN; Bressmann T; Poburka B; Roy N; Sharp H; Watts C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 25260176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.