188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21499923)
1. Validation of SINERGIA as training tool: a randomized study to test the transfer of acquired basic psychomotor skills to LapMentor.
Moyano-Cuevas JL; Sánchez-Margallo FM; Sánchez-Peralta LF; Pagador JB; Enciso S; Sánchez-González P; Gómez-Aguilera EJ; Usón-Gargallo J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Nov; 6(6):839-46. PubMed ID: 21499923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning curves of basic laparoscopic psychomotor skills in SINERGIA VR simulator.
Sánchez-Peralta LF; Sánchez-Margallo FM; Moyano-Cuevas JL; Pagador JB; Enciso S; Gómez-Aguilera EJ; Usón-Gargallo J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Nov; 7(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 22492427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construct and face validity of SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator.
Sánchez-Peralta LF; Sánchez-Margallo FM; Moyano-Cuevas JL; Pagador JB; Enciso-Sanz S; Sánchez-González P; Gómez-Aguilera EJ; Usón-Gargallo J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Jul; 5(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 20422300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trainee Performance After Laparoscopic Simulator Training Using a Blackbox versus LapMentor.
Oussi N; Enochsson L; Henningsohn L; Castegren M; Georgiou E; Kjellin A
J Surg Res; 2020 Jun; 250():1-11. PubMed ID: 32014696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer.
Maagaard M; Sorensen JL; Oestergaard J; Dalsgaard T; Grantcharov TP; Ottesen BS; Larsen CR
Surg Endosc; 2011 Mar; 25(3):722-7. PubMed ID: 20927549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single versus multimodality training basic laparoscopic skills.
Brinkman WM; Havermans SY; Buzink SN; Botden SM; Jakimowicz JJ; Schoot BC
Surg Endosc; 2012 Aug; 26(8):2172-8. PubMed ID: 22350237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training.
Thompson JR; Leonard AC; Doarn CR; Roesch MJ; Broderick TJ
Surg Endosc; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1107-14. PubMed ID: 20872023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.
Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Birkmeyer JD; Yellamanchilli RK; Doherty GM; Gauger PG; Minter RM
Ann Surg; 2006 Jun; 243(6):854-60; discussion 860-3. PubMed ID: 16772789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller.
Lahanas V; Loukas C; Georgiou K; Lababidi H; Al-Jaroudi D
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5012-5023. PubMed ID: 28466361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting.
Lehmann KS; Ritz JP; Maass H; Cakmak HK; Kuehnapfel UG; Germer CT; Bretthauer G; Buhr HJ
Ann Surg; 2005 Mar; 241(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 15729066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator.
Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychomotor skills and cognitive load training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for tubal surgery is effective.
Bharathan R; Vali S; Setchell T; Miskry T; Darzi A; Aggarwal R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 23608628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a novel basic virtual reality simulator, the LAP-X, for training basic laparoscopic skills.
Kawaguchi K; Egi H; Hattori M; Sawada H; Suzuki T; Ohdan H
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Oct; 23(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 24773373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a Novel Inverted Peg Transfer Task: Advancing Beyond the Regular Peg Transfer Task for Surgical Simulation-Based Assessment.
Abdelrahman AM; Yu D; Lowndes BR; Buckarma EH; Gas BL; Farley DR; Bingener J; Hallbeck MS
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):836-843. PubMed ID: 29037821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts.
Wilson M; McGrath J; Vine S; Brewer J; Defriend D; Masters R
Surg Endosc; 2010 Oct; 24(10):2458-64. PubMed ID: 20333405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing the minimal number of virtual reality simulator training sessions necessary to develop basic laparoscopic skills competence: evaluation of the learning curve.
Duarte RJ; Cury J; Oliveira LC; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):712-9. PubMed ID: 24267114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.
Arikatla VS; Sankaranarayanan G; Ahn W; Chellali A; De S; Caroline GL; Hwabejire J; DeMoya M; Schwaitzberg S; Jones DB
Surg Endosc; 2013 May; 27(5):1721-9. PubMed ID: 23263645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation-Based Training Platforms for Arthroscopy: A Randomized Comparison of Virtual Reality Learning to Benchtop Learning.
Middleton RM; Alvand A; Garfjeld Roberts P; Hargrove C; Kirby G; Rees JL
Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 28073670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]