BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21500088)

  • 1. Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied.
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21500088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.
    Hege AC; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):787-95. PubMed ID: 15238023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
    McCabe DP; Smith AD
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Dodson CS; Hege AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 16447388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():602347. PubMed ID: 33329270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Gallo DA; Bell DM; Beier JS; Schacter DL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):730-41. PubMed ID: 16829489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: mood and the false memory effect.
    Storbeck J; Clore GL
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):785-91. PubMed ID: 16181441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Divided attention during retrieval suppresses false recognition in confabulation.
    Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Borsotti M
    Cortex; 2009 Feb; 45(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 19150516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Variations of encoding and false memories in recall].
    Corson Y; Mahé A; Verrier N; Colombel et Luc Jagot F
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Dec; 65(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 21728403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
    Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. False memories in children and adults: age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience.
    Ghetti S; Qin J; Goodman GS
    Dev Psychol; 2002 Sep; 38(5):705-18. PubMed ID: 12220049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Fawcett JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):349-65. PubMed ID: 24853535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.
    Butler KM; McDaniel MA; McCabe DP; Dornburg CC
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Mar; 17(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 19642045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
    Miller MB; Guerin SA; Wolford GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1228-35. PubMed ID: 21767060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Item-specific processing reduces false memories.
    McCabe DP; Presmanes AG; Robertson CL; Smith AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1074-9. PubMed ID: 15875978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Hancock TW; Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12710219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prefrontal activity and diagnostic monitoring of memory retrieval: FMRI of the criterial recollection task.
    Gallo DA; Kensinger EA; Schacter DL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):135-48. PubMed ID: 16417689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affective valence influences participant's susceptibility to false memories and illusory recollection.
    Dehon H; Larøi F; Van der Linden M
    Emotion; 2010 Oct; 10(5):627-39. PubMed ID: 21038946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.