These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21500231)
1. The detection of chromosome anomalies by QF-PCR and residual risks as compared to G-banded analysis. Speevak MD; McGowan-Jordan J; Chun K Prenat Diagn; 2011 May; 31(5):454-8. PubMed ID: 21500231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent PCR with non-polymorphic loci in prenatal diagnosis]. Zhu XY; Hu YL; Wang YP; Zhu HY; Li J; Zhu RF; Zhang Y; Wu X; Yang Y Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 43(11):818-23. PubMed ID: 19087563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction versus cytogenetics: risk-related indication and clinical implication of nondetected chromosomal disorders. Kozlowski P; Grund I; Hickmann G; Stressig R; Knippel AJ Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006; 21(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 16491006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid aneuploidy testing versus traditional karyotyping in amniocentesis for certain referral indications. Comas C; Echevarria M; Carrera M; Serra B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Sep; 23(9):949-55. PubMed ID: 20718579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An algorithm for the prenatal detection of chromosome anomalies by QF-PCR and G-banded analysis. Speevak MD; Dolling J; Terespolsky D; Blumenthal A; Farrell SA Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(13):1221-6. PubMed ID: 19039827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromosome aberrations identified by cytogenetic analysis of the first two clones of cultured amniotic fluid cells compared with QF-PCR results. Jenderny J; Schmidt W; Kochhan L Cytogenet Genome Res; 2014; 142(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 24853086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The prevalence of non-detectable chromosomal abnormalities by QF-PCR in amniocentesis for certain referral indications: experience at a mainland Chinese hospital. Liao C; Yi CX; Li FT; Li DZ Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 289(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 23836406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. QF-PCR: application, overview and review of the literature. Mann K; Ogilvie CM Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 22467160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration. Nicolini U; Lalatta F; Natacci F; Curcio C; Bui TH Hum Reprod Update; 2004; 10(6):541-8. PubMed ID: 15514017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual testing with QF-PCR and karyotype analysis for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Evaluation of 13,500 cases with consideration of using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test according to referral indications. Papoulidis I; Siomou E; Sotiriadis A; Efstathiou G; Psara A; Sevastopoulou E; Anastasakis E; Sifakis S; Tsiligianni T; Kontodiou M; Malamaki C; Tzimina M; Petersen MB; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A Prenat Diagn; 2012 Jul; 32(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22513450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Chromosome analysis of diagnostic amniotic fluid cell cultures]. Kinoshita Y Rinsho Byori; 1989 Feb; Spec No 80():310-8. PubMed ID: 2630680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping. Stojilkovic-Mikic T; Mann K; Docherty Z; Mackie Ogilvie C Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15662689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multilevel regression modeling for aneuploidy classification and physical separation of maternal cell contamination facilitates the QF-PCR based analysis of common fetal aneuploidies. Noveski P; Terzic M; Vujovic M; Kuzmanovska M; Sukarova Stefanovska E; Plaseska-Karanfilska D PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221227. PubMed ID: 31430300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Hochstenbach R; Meijer J; van de Brug J; Vossebeld-Hoff I; Jansen R; van der Luijt RB; Sinke RJ; Page-Christiaens GC; Ploos van Amstel JK; de Pater JM Prenat Diagn; 2005 Nov; 25(11):1032-9. PubMed ID: 16231311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective analysis of cell-free fetal DNA concentration in maternal plasma as an indicator for adverse pregnancy outcome. Bauer M; Hutterer G; Eder M; Majer S; Leshane E; Johnson KL; Peter I; Bianchi DW; Pertl B Prenat Diagn; 2006 Sep; 26(9):831-6. PubMed ID: 16832830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A retrospective and theoretical evaluation of rapid methods for detecting chromosome abnormalities and their implications on genetic counseling based on a series of 3868 CVS diagnoses. Soler A; Morales C; Badenas C; Rodríguez-Revenga L; Carrió A; Margarit E; Costa D; Borrell A; Goncé A; Milà M; Sánchez A Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 23(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 18046070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation and experience of an alternative QF-PCR and MLPA diagnostic strategy to detect chromosomal abnormalities in fetal and neonatal pathology samples. McClelland LS; Allen SK; Larkins SA; Hamilton SJ; Marton T; Cox PM; Hargitai B; Johnston EH; Morgan C; Hardy G Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2011; 14(6):460-8. PubMed ID: 21875355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies using quantitative fluorescent PCR. Bili C; Divane A; Apessos A; Konstantinos T; Apostolos A; Ioannis B; Periklis T; Florentin L Prenat Diagn; 2002 May; 22(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 12001187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]