184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21500422)
1. New tax credit program aims to revive ailing biotech research.
Clin Transl Sci; 2010 Oct; 3(5):200. PubMed ID: 21500422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biotechs get $1 billion windfall in R&D tax credits.
Thiel K
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Dec; 27(12):1066. PubMed ID: 20010563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surprise US election results may boost biotech.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1176. PubMed ID: 12454655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Germany contemplates new biotech tax scheme.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 12776130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Windfall warning.
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the SBIR and STTR programs advance research goals?
Ceulemans S; Kolls JK
Nat Immunol; 2013 Mar; 14(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 23416667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Startups hope federal study fixes SBIR flaws.
Basu P
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):644. PubMed ID: 15175671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US biotech firms line up for tax credits.
Ledford H
Nature; 2010 Jun; 465(7300):854-5. PubMed ID: 20559355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Australian states compete for biotech primacy.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):760. PubMed ID: 12147988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Japanese council urges reform of funding system.
Triendl R
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1176-8. PubMed ID: 12454656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Funding. NIH program fails to launch blacks in biotech.
Mervis J
Science; 2015 Nov; 350(6263):896. PubMed ID: 26586739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. This is not your mentors' NIH--new strategies for research support.
Rivkees SA
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2006 Oct; 19(10):1187-9. PubMed ID: 17172079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Do biomaterials really mean business?
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Aug; 26(8):851-3. PubMed ID: 18688229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biotechnology transfer at the National Institutes of Health.
Chen PS
Qual Assur; 1993 Dec; 2(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 7952969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment: Academic return.
Eisenstein M
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7601):S20-1. PubMed ID: 27144604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
Baldwin W; McCardle P
Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biotech crowdfunding paves way for angels.
Orelli B
Nat Biotechnol; 2012 Nov; 30(11):1020. PubMed ID: 23138287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Following the money at the NIDCR.
Lunn RH
Cranio; 2004 Oct; 22(4):263-4. PubMed ID: 15532309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Healy attacks NASA's claims; bad news for research budgets.
Mervis J
Nature; 1992 Aug; 358(6386):441. PubMed ID: 1641030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Limit the number of grants per person.
Sachs F
Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6639):222. PubMed ID: 9230423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
