These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21500616)

  • 1. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Update; 2011 Mar; 38(2):78-80, 82-4. PubMed ID: 21500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repair versus replacement of defective direct dental restorations in posterior teeth of adults.
    Blum IR; Lynch CD
    Prim Dent J; 2014 May; 3(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 25215344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools.
    Lynch CD; Blum IR; Frazier KB; Haisch LD; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22298557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson HH
    SADJ; 2011 Apr; 66(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 21874891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
    Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct composite resin restorations for today's practice.
    Nash RW
    Dent Today; 2013 Jul; 32(7):114, 116, 118. PubMed ID: 23926718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finishing and polishing criteria for minimally invasive composite restorations.
    LeSage B
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):422-8; quiz 429-30. PubMed ID: 22313913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
    Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defective direct composite restorations--replace or repair? A survey of teaching in Scandinavian dental schools.
    Blum IR; Mjör IA; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Wilson NH
    Swed Dent J; 2003; 27(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 14608966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania.
    Brunton PA; Ghazali A; Tarif ZH; Loch C; Lynch C; Wilson N; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():62-67. PubMed ID: 28232082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repair versus replacement of defective composite restorations in dental schools in Germany.
    Blum IR; Lynch CD; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 19(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 21780727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley J; Geraldeli S; Williams OD; Spoto JC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1528-34. PubMed ID: 25223822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repair versus replacement of defective direct composite restorations in teaching programmes in United Kingdom and Irish Dental Schools.
    Blum IR; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 12526271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.