502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21500903)
1. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces.
Hodsoll S; Viding E; Lavie N
Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 21500903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources.
Huang SL; Chang YC; Chen YJ
Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 21517157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal processing of emotional stimuli: the capture and release of attention by angry faces.
Maratos FA
Emotion; 2011 Oct; 11(5):1242-7. PubMed ID: 21942702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search.
Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities.
Pinkham AE; Griffin M; Baron R; Sasson NJ; Gur RC
Emotion; 2010 Feb; 10(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 20141311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional bias to angry faces using the dot-probe task? It depends when you look for it.
Cooper RM; Langton SR
Behav Res Ther; 2006 Sep; 44(9):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16321361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings.
Glickman M; Lamy D
Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):303-314. PubMed ID: 28281398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid communication: Global-local processing affects recognition of distractor emotional faces.
Srinivasan N; Gupta R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 21347993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions.
Lipp OV; Price SM; Tellegen CL
Emotion; 2009 Apr; 9(2):248-59. PubMed ID: 19348536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attentional selectivity for emotional faces: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Holmes A; Bradley BP; Kragh Nielsen M; Mogg K
Psychophysiology; 2009 Jan; 46(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19055500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces.
Burra N; Coll SY; Barras C; Kerzel D
Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():44-49. PubMed ID: 27899310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attention for emotional faces under restricted awareness revisited: do emotional faces automatically attract attention?
Koster EH; Verschuere B; Burssens B; Custers R; Crombez G
Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):285-95. PubMed ID: 17516808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.
Barratt D; Bundesen C
Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(7):1223-37. PubMed ID: 22416914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional effects of negative faces: top-down contingent or involuntary?
Horstmann G; Becker SI
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1416-34. PubMed ID: 19064487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of facial expression on memory for facial identity: effects of visual features or emotional meaning?
D'Argembeau A; Van der Linden M
Emotion; 2011 Feb; 11(1):199-202. PubMed ID: 21401241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aging and visual search: automatic and controlled attentional bias to threat faces.
Hahn S; Carlson C; Singer S; Gronlund SD
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):312-36. PubMed ID: 16524554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The time course of attentional disengagement from angry faces in social anxiety.
Moriya J; Tanno Y
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 42(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20797697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The time-course of attention to emotional faces in social phobia.
Gamble AL; Rapee RM
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 19781689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.
Maxwell JS; Shackman AJ; Davidson RJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1386-95. PubMed ID: 16197692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
