These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21500939)
1. For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: testing the syllable-bigram controversy. Kandel S; Peereman R; Grosjacques G; Fayol M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1310-22. PubMed ID: 21500939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels. Conrad M; Carreiras M; Tamm S; Jacobs AM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 19331501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production. Kandel S; Hérault L; Grosjacques G; Lambert E; Fayol M Cognition; 2009 Mar; 110(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 19150536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Processing of syllables during handwriting: effects of graphomotor constraints. Sausset S; Lambert E; Olive T; Larocque D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1872-9. PubMed ID: 22950838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Kandel S; Alvarez CJ; Vallée N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 16478323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The nature of the phonological processing in French dyslexic children: evidence for the phonological syllable and linguistic features' role in silent reading and speech discrimination. Maïonchi-Pino N; Magnan A; Ecalle J Ann Dyslexia; 2010 Dec; 60(2):123-50. PubMed ID: 20533097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision. Muncer SJ; Knight DC Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2221-30. PubMed ID: 22804754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tip-of-the-tongue states reveal age differences in the syllable frequency effect. Farrell MT; Abrams L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):277-85. PubMed ID: 21244118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How does the interaction between spelling and motor processes build up during writing acquisition? Kandel S; Perret C Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():325-36. PubMed ID: 25525970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The interaction between central and peripheral processes in handwriting production. Roux S; McKeeff TJ; Grosjacques G; Afonso O; Kandel S Cognition; 2013 May; 127(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 23454797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Typing is writing: Linguistic properties modulate typing execution. Pinet S; Ziegler JC; Alario FX Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1898-1906. PubMed ID: 27112563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interaction between predictability and pre-boundary lengthening on syllable duration in Taiwan Southern Min. Wang SF Phonetica; 2022 Aug; 79(4):315-352. PubMed ID: 36327446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Naming pseudowords in Spanish: effects of syllable frequency. Carreiras M; Perea M Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):393-400. PubMed ID: 15172555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cholin J; Levelt WJ; Schiller NO Cognition; 2006 Mar; 99(2):205-35. PubMed ID: 15939415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Processing complex graphemes in handwriting production. Kandel S; Spinelli E Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 20852239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Syllabic processing in handwritten word production in German children and adults. Hess S; Mousikou P; Verrel J; Schroeder S Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Jun; 65():. PubMed ID: 30170765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Activation of syllable units during visual recognition of French words in Grade 2. Chetail F; Mathey S J Child Lang; 2009 Sep; 36(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 19079827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Delattre M; Bonin P; Barry C J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1330-40. PubMed ID: 17087587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. McBride-Chang C; Bialystok E; Chong KK; Li Y J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(2):93-111. PubMed ID: 15388300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developmental role of static, dynamic, and contextual cues in speech perception. Bourland Hicks C; Ohde RN J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):960-74. PubMed ID: 16378485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]