These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21500943)

  • 1. Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load: a closer look at load theory.
    Fitousi D; Wenger MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):781-98. PubMed ID: 21500943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual and cognitive load interact to control the spatial focus of attention.
    Linnell KJ; Caparos S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1643-8. PubMed ID: 21767051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach.
    Kyllingsbæk S; Sy JL; Giesbrecht B
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1487-97. PubMed ID: 21145901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.
    Lavie N
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Feb; 9(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 15668100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness.
    Lavie N
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 16413514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of working memory in tactile selective attention.
    Dalton P; Lavie N; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):635-44. PubMed ID: 19096988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.
    Lavie N; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 11595091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cognitive functions, their development and modern diagnostic methods].
    Klasik A; Janas-Kozik M; Krupka-Matuszczyk I; Augustyniak E
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63 Suppl 1():29-34. PubMed ID: 17471820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm.
    Wenger MJ; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):708-19. PubMed ID: 15301619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.
    Tsal Y; Benoni H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1645-56. PubMed ID: 20822300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new perspective on the perceptual selectivity of attention under load.
    Giesbrecht B; Sy J; Bundesen C; Kyllingsbaek S
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 May; 1316():71-86. PubMed ID: 24716751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An accuracy-response time capacity assessment function that measures performance against standard parallel predictions.
    Townsend JT; Altieri N
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jul; 119(3):500-16. PubMed ID: 22775497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.
    He J; McCarley JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.
    Howes A; Lewis RL; Vera A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):717-51. PubMed ID: 19839682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.
    Benoni H; Tsal Y
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Operation compatibility: a neglected contribution to dual-task costs.
    Pannebakker MM; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):447-60. PubMed ID: 19331500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.