117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2150110)
21. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
Bonne NX; Douchement D; Hosana G; Desruelles J; Fayoux P; Ruzza I; Vincent C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Examination and Comparison of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Results of Children with Cochlear Implantation without Inner Ear Anomaly.
Bayrak S; Mutlu B; Kırkım G; Şerbetçioğlu B
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 57(2):81-85. PubMed ID: 31360925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response-based evaluation of the spatial distribution of auditory neuronal tissue in common cavity deformities.
Yamazaki H; Naito Y; Fujiwara K; Moroto S; Yamamoto R; Yamazaki T; Sasaki I
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1394-402. PubMed ID: 24770408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Properties of auditory brainstem responses evoked by intra-operative electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus in human subjects.
Waring MD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):538-48. PubMed ID: 8980418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: Psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements.
Macherey O; Stahl P; Intartaglia B; Meunier S; Roman S; Schön D
Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108176. PubMed ID: 33524792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability and predictive value of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.
Aubert LR; Clarke GP
Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 7841895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing PR; Sommer A; Kuzma J; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
Shallop JK; Beiter AL; Goin DW; Mischke RE
Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 2307303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Refractory properties of auditory brain-stem responses evoked by electrical stimulation of human cochlear nucleus: evidence of neural generators.
Waring MD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 9714375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Usefulness of Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess the Functionality of the Cochlear Nerve Using an Intracochlear Test Electrode.
Lassaletta L; Polak M; Huesers J; Díaz-Gómez M; Calvino M; Varela-Nieto I; Gavilán J
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e413-e420. PubMed ID: 29076926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Loudness growth functions and EABR characteristics in Digisonic cochlear implantees.
Gallégo S; Garnier S; Micheyl C; Truy E; Morgon A; Collet L
Acta Otolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 119(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10320083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants.
Wang Z; Liu Y; Wang L; Shen X; Han S; Wang W; Gao F; Liang W; Peng KA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Bacciu A; Guida M; Bacciu S
Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following acute electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: III. Capacitive versus non-capacitive coupling of the stimulating electrodes.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK; Seligman PM; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 9508028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Progressively Recovering Auditory Brainstem Response in a Cochlear-implanted Child After Meningitis: A Case Report.
Michel F
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 26485596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
