These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2150110)

  • 41. Auditory brain-stem responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus in human subjects.
    Waring MD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Jul; 96(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 7635078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level.
    Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 1991 Jan; 51(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 2013539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users.
    Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Delayed Auditory Brainstem Responses in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lammers MJ; van Eijl RH; van Zanten GA; Versnel H; Grolman W
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 26162414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. EABRs and surface potentials with a transcutaneous multielectrode cochlear implant.
    Gallégo S; Truy E; Morgon A; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Mar; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 9105440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wei CG; Wang Y; Li H
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant.
    Harris MS; Riggs WJ; Koka K; Litvak LM; Malhotra P; Moberly AC; O'Connell BP; Holder J; Di Lella FA; Boccio CM; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e107-e113. PubMed ID: 28498269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. IV. Effects of stimulus intensity.
    Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 132(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 10392548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response monitoring of auditory brainstem implant integrity during facial nerve tumor surgery.
    Waring MD
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Nov; 102(11):1293-5. PubMed ID: 1405993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [An experimental study on the auditory brainstem response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea].
    Saito H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Jan; 93(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 2319389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Development of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response modules of REZ-I domestic cochlear implant device].
    Ding X; Zhang R; Xu C; Fan W; Zhang D
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 49(12):1013-6. PubMed ID: 25623869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
    Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of stimulation parameters on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Tavartkiladze GA; Potalova LA; Kruglov AV; Belov A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 120(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 11603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
    Cinar BC; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans.
    van den Honert C; Stypulkowski PH
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 3754550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.