These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21501218)
1. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Crossley J; Johnson G; Booth J; Wade W Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 21501218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Respecting the expertise of clinician assessors: construct alignment is one good answer. Ginsburg S Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):546-8. PubMed ID: 21564196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Making sense of work-based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people. Crossley J; Jolly B Med Educ; 2012 Jan; 46(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 22150194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Competency-based training: who benefits? Brightwell A; Grant J Postgrad Med J; 2013 Feb; 89(1048):107-10. PubMed ID: 23019588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of surgical skills in implant dentistry. Bousdras V; Aghabeigi B; Petrie A; Evans AW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 15346751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An experimental comparison of rater performance on an SP-based clinical skills exam. Han JJ; Kreiter CD; Park H; Ferguson KJ Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 17144834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Scheele F; Driessen EW; Hodges B Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):703-19. PubMed ID: 20510653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conceptualising and classifying validity evidence for simulation. Andreatta PB; Gruppen LD Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1028-35. PubMed ID: 19874494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attention to gender in communication skills assessment instruments in medical education: a review. Dielissen P; Bottema B; Verdonk P; Lagro-Janssen T Med Educ; 2011 Mar; 45(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 21299599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence. Lubarsky S; Charlin B; Cook DA; Chalk C; van der Vleuten CP Med Educ; 2011 Apr; 45(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 21401680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unsigned: why anonymous evaluations in clinical settings are counterproductive. Guerrasio J; Weissberg M Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 46(10):928-30. PubMed ID: 22989124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A wider perspective on assessment. Eraut M Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):803-4. PubMed ID: 15271039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managing extremes of assessor judgment within the OSCE. Fuller R; Homer M; Pell G; Hallam J Med Teach; 2017 Jan; 39(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 27670246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twelve tips for increasing the defensibility of assessment decisions. Hays RB; Hamlin G; Crane L Med Teach; 2015 May; 37(5):433-6. PubMed ID: 25109230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Merging views on assessment. Schuwirth L; van der Vleuten C Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1208-10. PubMed ID: 15566527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Competency-based assessment: making it a reality. Davis MH; Harden RM Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 15369903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct observation in medical education: a review of the literature and evidence for validity. Fromme HB; Karani R; Downing SM Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Aug; 76(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 19642150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Capturing the essence of developing endovascular expertise for the construction of a global assessment instrument. Bech B; Lönn L; Schroeder TV; Räder SB; Ringsted C Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 40(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 20807686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]