95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2150181)
1. Fissure sealant retention: a comparison of three sealant types under field conditions.
Barrie AM; Stephen KW; Kay EJ
Community Dent Health; 1990 Sep; 7(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 2150181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.
Autio-Gold JT
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 12120768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fissure sealant in permanent first molars after 10 years.
Wendt LK; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1988; 12(5):181-5. PubMed ID: 2975403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Fluroshield with Delton fissure sealant: four year results.
Lygidakis NA; Oulis KI
Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(7):429-31. PubMed ID: 10633516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
Qin M; Liu H
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of three fissure sealants and a dentin bonding system used as fissure sealant in caries prevention: 12-month follow-up results.
Baca P; Bravo M; Baca AP; Jiménez A; González-Rodríguez MP
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Oct; 12(6):E459-63. PubMed ID: 17909514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of fissure sealants after occlusal enameloplasty and thermocycling.
Xalabarde A; Garcia-Godoy F; Boj JR; Canalda C
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9641098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention and effectiveness of fissure sealants in Kuwaiti school children.
Francis R; Mascarenhas AK; Soparkar P; Al-Mutawaa S
Community Dent Health; 2008 Dec; 25(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 19149297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of air abrasion versus acid etch sealant techniques: six-month retention.
Kanellis MJ; Warren JJ; Levy SM
Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 9200197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of two fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical follow-up.
Yildiz E; Dörter C; Efes B; Koray F
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):979-84. PubMed ID: 15387838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fissure sealants in primary molars: retention of colored sealants with variable etch times, at twelve months.
Simonsen RJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 1979; 46(5):382-4. PubMed ID: 383759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study between visible-light-activated and autopolymerizing sealants in relation to retention.
Gandini M; Vertuan V; Davis JM
ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 1834707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention and maintenance of fissure sealants over 10 years.
Romcke RG; Lewis DW; Maze BD; Vickerson RA
J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 2184918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of pit and fissure sealants on infrared fluorescence measurements.
Diniz MB; Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Cordeiro RC; Lussi A
Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 18701822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent.
Boksman L; McConnell RJ; Carson B; McCutcheon-Jones EF
Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 8511264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical trial to evaluate the retention of a silver cermet-ionomer cement used as a fissure sealant.
Mills RW; Ball IA
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):148-54. PubMed ID: 8152983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a community fissure sealant programme in County Meath, Ireland.
Parnell CA; O'Farrell M; Howell F; Hegarty M
Community Dent Health; 2003 Sep; 20(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 12940304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite-based fissure sealant: two-year results.
Güngör HC; Altay N; Alpar R
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 15195724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of a fluoride-releasing sealant compared with its non-fluoride analogue: interim results of a clinical study after an average of eight months.
Heifetz SB; Yaari A; Proskin HM
J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15218708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
