150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21502380)
1. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs.
Erkan M; Gurel HG; Nur M; Demirel B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 21502380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and accuracy of three different computerized cephalometric analysis software.
Rusu O; Petcu AE; Drăgan E; Haba D; Moscalu M; Zetu IN
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2015; 119(1):248-56. PubMed ID: 25970975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of hand-tracing and cephalometric analysis computer programs with and without advanced features--accuracy and time demands.
Tsorovas G; Karsten AL
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 20554891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction.
Power G; Breckon J; Sherriff M; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15916879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms.
Chung RR; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
Int Orthod; 2009 Dec; 7(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 20303918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs: a methodological error.
Sabour S; Dastjerdi EV
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 35(6):848. PubMed ID: 24132404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method--a preliminary study.
Singh P; Davies TI
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 20923935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables.
Dvortsin DP; Sandham A; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 18719051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
Goracci C; Ferrari M
Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy.
Roden-Johnson D; English J; Gallerano R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 18405820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
da Silveira HL; Silveira HE
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods.
Albarakati SF; Kula KS; Ghoneima AA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22184624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis.
Thurzo A; Javorka V; Stanko P; Lysy J; Suchancova B; Lehotska V; Valkovic L; Makovnik M
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 20429323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms.
Borrie F; Thomson D; McIntyre GT
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21300728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
