These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21502509)

  • 1. Humans and monkeys share visual representations.
    Fize D; Cauchoix M; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(18):7635-40. PubMed ID: 21502509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual Congruency Effect in Natural Scene Categorization: Different Strategies in Humans and Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Collet AC; Fize D; VanRullen R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133721. PubMed ID: 26207915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The transfer of category knowledge by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Zakrzewski AC; Church BA; Smith JD
    J Comp Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132(1):58-74. PubMed ID: 29239647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary Constraints on Human Object Perception.
    Koopman SE; Mahon BZ; Cantlon JF
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2126-2148. PubMed ID: 28032661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spotting animals in natural scenes: efficiency of humans and monkeys at very low contrasts.
    Macé MJ; Delorme A; Richard G; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):405-18. PubMed ID: 19921288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.
    Kaiser D; Oosterhof NN; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(41):10522-10528. PubMed ID: 27733605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reciprocal semantic predictions drive categorization of scene contexts and objects even when they are separate.
    Leroy A; Faure S; Spotorno S
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8447. PubMed ID: 32439874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stages of category learning in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Smith JD; Chapman WP; Redford JS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 20141316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird.
    Macé MJ; Joubert OR; Nespoulous JL; Fabre-Thorpe M
    PLoS One; 2009 Jun; 4(6):e5927. PubMed ID: 19536292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Smith JD; Beran MJ; Crossley MJ; Boomer J; Ashby FG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20141317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced visual exploration for real objects compared to pictures during free viewing in the macaque monkey.
    Mustafar F; De Luna P; Rainer G
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():8-20. PubMed ID: 26003135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impairment in object-in-place scene learning after uncinate fascicle section in macaque monkeys.
    Browning PG; Gaffan D
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 122(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 18410187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Processing Speed of Scene Categorization at Multiple Levels of Description: The Superordinate Advantage Revisited.
    Banno H; Saiki J
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):269-88. PubMed ID: 26562252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference.
    Joubert OR; Rousselet GA; Fize D; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3286-97. PubMed ID: 17967472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional characteristics of the associative areas of the cortex involved in visual information discrimination learning processes in monkeys.
    Dudkin KN; Chueva IV; Makarov FN
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2004 Jan; 34(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 15109087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Broad and narrow conceptual tuning in the human frontal lobes.
    Gotts SJ; Milleville SC; Bellgowan PS; Martin A
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Feb; 21(2):477-91. PubMed ID: 20562319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Categorization of biologically significant objects, food and gender, in rhesus monkeys. I. Behavioral study.
    Inoue T; Hasegawa T; Takara S; Lukáts B; Mizuno M; Aou S
    Neurosci Res; 2008 May; 61(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 18329121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incongruent object/context relationships in visual scenes: where are they processed in the brain?
    Rémy F; Vayssière N; Pins D; Boucart M; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Feb; 84(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 24280445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Essentialism in the absence of language? Evidence from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Phillips W; Shankar M; Santos LR
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jul; 13(4):F1-7. PubMed ID: 20590717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.