These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2150253)

  • 1. [Ultrasonic root planing. An alternative method versus hand instruments? An in vitro comparison and SEM study].
    van Gogswaardt DC; Behrens VG
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 2150253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Scaling and root polishing with curets and ultrasonic and pneumatic planers: SEM observations of the root surface].
    Picarelli A; Alessio RA; Deli G; Fossato L
    Minerva Stomatol; 1985; 34(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 3900680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro.
    Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Scanning electron microscopic examination of root surfaces after scaling and root planing].
    Esposito V; Vaia E; Zarone F; Bozzini V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1988 Feb; 37(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 3287128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Tartar removal by hand instruments and by ultrasonic apparatus. Current approaches and recent findings].
    Picarelli A; Alessio R; Fossato L
    Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 6394984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mechanical preparation of root surfaces: studies with scanning electron and light microscopy. (Comparison of the Piezon and the Air Scaler)].
    De Marchi M; Rabito M; Cordioli GP
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1984; 3(3):501-7. PubMed ID: 6399500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature].
    Deblauwe BM; van der Weijden GA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Jul; 99(7):239-44. PubMed ID: 11819997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.
    Drisko CL
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1993; ():78-88. PubMed ID: 8401851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ultrastructural aspects of root planing: scanning electron microscopy (S.E.M.)].
    Pallassini A; Mannelli A; Sandroni F; Chicco G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1989 Nov; 38(11):1215-20. PubMed ID: 2695821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determination of the time it takes to do scaling and root planing by ultrasonic instruments, the effect of the sharpness of the tips, the effect of these tips on the cement and the effectiveness of the ultrasonic instruments made in Turkey].
    Kandemir S; Ilgenli T
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 Sep; 15(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3078147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of two ultrasonic tips on root surfaces--in vivo.
    Clark SM
    Gen Dent; 1990; 38(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 2132225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning electron microscope: an SEM study of periodontally instrumented root surfaces, comparing sharp, dull, and damaged curettes and ultrasonic instruments.
    Benfenati MP; Montesani MT; Roncati M; Nathanson D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1987; 7(2):50-67. PubMed ID: 3294697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Scaling and root planing: principles and modalities].
    Vaia E; Bozzini V; Nicolò M; Riccitiello F
    Minerva Stomatol; 1988 Feb; 37(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 3287126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of wear of dental curettes during standardized root planing.
    Tal H; Panno JM; Vaidyanathan TK
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):532-6. PubMed ID: 3897505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study of the influence of different instruments for removing dental deposits on tooth surface].
    Kuchumova ED; Stiuf IaV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(6):27-30. PubMed ID: 17310945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.