These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21503274)

  • 21. A deep learning based segregation algorithm to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in reverberant-noisy conditions.
    Zhao Y; Wang D; Johnson EM; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1627. PubMed ID: 30424625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Approach to Improve Speech Intelligibility for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Lai YH; Tsao Y; Lu X; Chen F; Su YT; Chen KC; Chen YH; Chen LC; Po-Hung Li L; Lee CH
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):795-809. PubMed ID: 29360687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spoken word recognition in adolescent cochlear implant users during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions.
    Tobey EA; Shin S; Sundarrajan M; Geers AE
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21307815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Wiinberg A; Zaar J; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775293. PubMed ID: 29756553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
    Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Xu B; Pentony S; Xu J; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1523. PubMed ID: 29604671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Dooley GJ; Blamey PJ; Seligman PM
    Audiology; 1994; 33(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8129677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustical and Perceptual Analysis of Noise Reduction Strategies in Individuals With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders.
    Jaisinghani P; Manjula P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4208-4218. PubMed ID: 33175645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of noise reduction methods for sentence recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant listeners.
    Chen F; Hu Y; Yuan M
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25127321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lee JH; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1153-63. PubMed ID: 19206889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the effect of noise-reduction to the intelligibility of low-pass filtered speech.
    Huimin Zhuge ; Lei Wang ; Fei Chen ; Dingchang Zheng
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4563-4566. PubMed ID: 28269292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative intelligibility investigation of single-channel noise-reduction algorithms for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Yang L; Zhang J; Yan Y; Hu Y; Akagi M; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3291-301. PubMed ID: 21568430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.