These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Allergy patch test reading from photographic images: disagreement on ICDRG grading but agreement on simplified tripartite reading. Ivens U; Serup J; O'goshi K Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 17250541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The role of vehicles in diagnostic patch testing. A reappraisal. Tanglertsampan C; Maibach HI Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Oct; 29(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8281777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997. Albert MR; Chang Y; González E Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2009 to 2010. Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; DeKoven JG; Zirwas MJ; Fransway AF; Mathias CG; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Marks JG; Pratt MD; Storrs FJ; Maibach HI Dermatitis; 2013; 24(2):50-9. PubMed ID: 23474444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series. Bilcha KD; Ayele A; Shibeshi D; Lovell C Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 20690936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Pitfalls of the patch tests]. Hannuksela M Duodecim; 2000; 116(17):1845-9; quiz 1850, 1866. PubMed ID: 12001639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Effect of prolongation of exposure time on the results of patch tests]. Kieć-Swierczyńska M Przegl Dermatol; 1980; 67(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 7433710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Patch testing: after 100 years, still the gold standard in diagnosing cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity. Belsito DV Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M; 1997; (91):195-202. PubMed ID: 9383910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Guidelines for care of contact dermatitis. Bourke J; Coulson I; English J; Br J Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 145(6):877-85. PubMed ID: 11899139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinically relevant contact allergy to formaldehyde may be missed by testing with formaldehyde 1·0%. Hauksson I; Pontén A; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Bruze M Br J Dermatol; 2011 Mar; 164(3):568-72. PubMed ID: 21114477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Patch test reactions to human dander in atopic dermatitis. Uehara M; Ofuji S Arch Dermatol; 1976 Jul; 112(7):951-4. PubMed ID: 938073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens with a standard screening tray of 28 allergens. Patel D; Belsito DV Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 22320669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004. Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]