These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21505577)
1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. Persu C; Chapple CR; Cauni V; Gutue S; Geavlete P J Med Life; 2011; 4(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 21505577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of assessing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Lone FW; Thakar R; Sultan AH; Stankiewicz A Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 22543548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography grading with POP-Q staging and Baden-Walker grading in the evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse. Pollock GR; Twiss CO; Chartier S; Vedantham S; Funk J; Arif Tiwari H Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1373-1380. PubMed ID: 31720767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of 'normal pelvic organ support'. Dietz HP; Kamisan Atan I; Salita A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 25854801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system? Madhu C; Swift S; Moloney-Geany S; Drake MJ Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(S6):S39-S43. PubMed ID: 30614056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Swamy N; Bajaj G; Olliphant SS; Henry JA; Jambhekar K; Pandey T; Ram R Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32211947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of the Relationship Between Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) Staging and Decubitus Ulcer in Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Samantray SR; Mohapatra I Cureus; 2021 Jan; 13(1):e12443. PubMed ID: 33552762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in China. Wang YT; Jiang JY; Han JS Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):287-90. PubMed ID: 26353847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position. Leerasiri P; Wachasiddhisilpa P; Hengrasmee P; Asumpinwong C Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1173-1177. PubMed ID: 29508045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical study on pubococcygeal line determined by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging used in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse]. Miao YL; Zhang XH; Wu J; Kang Y; Hong N; Wang JL Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 45(12):900-3. PubMed ID: 21211420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse and its association with prolapse severity according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Gava G; Alvisi S; Mancini I; Seracchioli R; Meriggiola MC Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30539201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence, etiology and risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse in premenopausal primiparous women. Durnea CM; Khashan AS; Kenny LC; Durnea UA; Smyth MM; O'Reilly BA Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1463-70. PubMed ID: 24737300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Ghanbari Z; Peivandi S; Pasikhani MD; Darabi F Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Nov; 30(6):921-928. PubMed ID: 33883837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. POP-Q stage I prolapse: is it time to alter our terminology? Toozs-Hobson P; Swift S Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Apr; 25(4):445-6. PubMed ID: 24504064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Utilize the simplified POP-Q system in the clinical practice of staging for pelvic organ prolapse: comparative analysis with standard POP-Q system]. Zhang H; Zhu L; Xu T; Lang JH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):510-4. PubMed ID: 27465870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of episiotomy on pelvic organ prolapse assessed by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Aytan H; Tok EC; Ertunc D; Yasa O Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Feb; 173():34-7. PubMed ID: 24314799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Turkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliability. Özengin N; Kaya S; Orhan C; Bakar Y; Duran B; Ankaralı H; Akbayrak T Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1217-1222. PubMed ID: 28062904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists. Kim SR; Suh DH; Jeon MJ BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):207. PubMed ID: 34006265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by consecutive cough maneuver. Pacquée S; Dietz HP Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):185-190. PubMed ID: 35501568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic, High-Fidelity, 3-Dimensional Pelvic Model Improves Education on Pelvic Organ Prolapse and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System and Interest in Urogynecology. Goodwin AI; Trahan SC; Neuwirth AE; Goldstein T; Demertzis K; Finamore PS; O'Shaughnessy DL Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Feb; 29(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 36735437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]