These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

659 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21505912)

  • 1. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
    Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR
    Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
    Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to review a manuscript.
    Alam M
    Dermatol Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):883-8. PubMed ID: 26218722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal.
    Frank E
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 8860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.
    Duff K; O'Bryant SE; Westervelt HJ; Sweet JJ; Reynolds CR; van Gorp WG; Tranel D; McCaffrey RJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 24(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 19640873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
    Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
    Lusher AD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.
    Herron DM
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Aug; 26(8):2275-80. PubMed ID: 22350231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to "peer review" a medical journal manuscript.
    Salasche SJ
    Dermatol Surg; 1997 Jun; 23(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 9217794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer Review and Medical Journals.
    Nugent K; Peterson CJ
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2024; 15():21501319241252235. PubMed ID: 38682542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality.
    Callaham ML; Tercier J
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e40. PubMed ID: 17411314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendations for reviewing manuscripts of the article types "project report" and "how to" for the GMS Journal for Medical Education.
    Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Homberg A; Giesler M; Schneider A; Gadewoltz P; Boeker M; Möltner A; Matthes J
    GMS J Med Educ; 2024; 41(4):Doc36. PubMed ID: 39415807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the quality of the peer review process: author and editorial board member perspectives.
    Bunner C; Larson EL
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 Oct; 40(8):701-4. PubMed ID: 23021414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
    Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.