These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21506316)

  • 21. [DEGUM standards for sonographic examinations in gynecology and obstetrics].
    Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1. PubMed ID: 11253548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology: the call to arms.
    Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1058-9. PubMed ID: 17077223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The expertise of quality assessment of obstetric-gynecologic and neonatal care at different stages of its delivery].
    Probl Sotsialnoi Gig Zdravookhranenniiai Istor Med; 2011; (3):34-6. PubMed ID: 21901878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality assurance: measuring its effect on a busy obstetric service.
    Philipson EH; Curry SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):131-3. PubMed ID: 8272294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Failure to rescue: implications for evaluating quality of care during labor and birth.
    Simpson KR
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2005; 19(1):24-34; quiz 35-6. PubMed ID: 15796422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology: an agenda for the future.
    Pearlman MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1266-71. PubMed ID: 17077254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Embedding quality improvement and patient safety at Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust.
    Scholefield H
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):593-607. PubMed ID: 17448729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing Medicaid patients' perceptions of the OB/GYN-patient relationship.
    Crutchfield TN; Eveland VB; Eveland AP
    Health Mark Q; 2002; 19(4):21-37. PubMed ID: 12557987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Indicators as the basis for quality-control in the midwifery practice].
    Boomsma LJ; Offerhaus PM; Daemers DO; Flikweert S
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jun; 149(24):1318-9. PubMed ID: 16008033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characteristics of patients seen and services provided in primary care visits in obstetrics/gynecology: data from NAMCS and NHAMCS.
    Scholle SH; Chang J; Harman J; McNeil M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 190(4):1119-27. PubMed ID: 15118652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How can we achieve consensual indicators to be better accepted and more widely used?
    Santos JV; Correia C; Cabral F; Bernardes J; Freitas A; Costa-Pereira A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Feb; 173():123-4; discussion 124. PubMed ID: 24331113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Building a European perinatal health information system: plurality, innovation and realism.
    Zeitlin J; Mohangoo A; Macfarlane A; Cuttini M; Delnord M; Gissler M; Blondel B; Alexander S; Barros H;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):193-4. PubMed ID: 24007622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The problems in organizing forensic medical expertise in cases of professional law infringements by medical workers (exemplified by obstetrical-gynecological service)].
    Plaksin VO; Gurtovoĭ BL; Oboĭmakov VB
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8184455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Inpatient obstetric-gynecological services in the corporate type medical centers].
    Zasypkin MIu
    Probl Sotsialnoi Gig Zdravookhranenniiai Istor Med; 2003; (1):38-40. PubMed ID: 12712564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The medical birth registry--obstetric quality development and research].
    Lange AP
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Nov; 156(46):6880. PubMed ID: 7839508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What would an Evidence-based statement on homebirths from ACOG say?
    Cohain JS
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (86):32; discussion 32-33. PubMed ID: 18630012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice in Turkey: incidence, impact, causes and prevention.
    Büken E; Ornek Büken N; Büken B
    J Clin Forensic Med; 2004 Oct; 11(5):233-47. PubMed ID: 15489176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Model Project 2004 of the DEGUM Section Gynaecology and Obstetrics].
    Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2003 Oct; 24(5):302. PubMed ID: 14562207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should European perinatal indicators be revisited?
    Santos JV; Correia C; Cabral F; Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Freitas A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 23809998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regional quality assessment in perinatal care.
    Lindmark G; Langhoff-Roos J
    Semin Neonatol; 2004 Apr; 9(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 16256718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.