BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21506689)

  • 1. Scientists' perception of ethical issues in nanomedicine: a case study.
    Silva Costa H; Sethe S; Pêgo AP; Olsson IA
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2011 Jun; 6(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 21506689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regenerative nanomedicine: ethical, legal, and social issues.
    Glenn LM; Boyce JS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 811():303-16. PubMed ID: 22042687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upstream ethics in nanomedicine: a call for research.
    Khushf G
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2007 Aug; 2(4):511-21. PubMed ID: 17716134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical issues in nanomedicine: Tempest in a teapot?
    Allon I; Ben-Yehudah A; Dekel R; Solbakk JH; Weltring KM; Siegal G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Mar; 20(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 27522374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.
    Corley EA; Kim Y; Scheufele DA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):111-32. PubMed ID: 25721444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The coming era of nanomedicine.
    Allhoff F
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Oct; 9(10):3-11. PubMed ID: 19998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outlining ethical issues in nanotechnologies.
    Spagnolo AG; Daloiso V
    Bioethics; 2009 Sep; 23(7):394-402. PubMed ID: 19673855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuroscientists' everyday experiences of ethics: the interplay of regulatory, professional, personal and tangible ethical spheres.
    Brosnan C; Cribb A; Wainwright SP; Williams C
    Sociol Health Illn; 2013 Nov; 35(8):1133-48. PubMed ID: 23397962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discourses of dislike: responses to ethics education policies by life scientists in the U.K., Italy, and the U.S.
    Smith-Doerr L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Jun; 4(2):49-57. PubMed ID: 19480591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pharmacogenomics research involving racial classification: qualitative research findings on researchers' views, perceptions and attitudes towards socioethical responsibilities.
    Egalité N; Ozdemir V; Godard B
    Pharmacogenomics; 2007 Sep; 8(9):1115-26. PubMed ID: 17924827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory.
    Wainwright SP; Williams C; Michael M; Farsides B; Cribb A
    Sociol Health Illn; 2006 Sep; 28(6):732-48. PubMed ID: 17184415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A portrait of nanomedicine and its bioethical implications.
    Hall RM; Sun T; Ferrari M
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(4):763-79. PubMed ID: 23289679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):21-34. PubMed ID: 20569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanomedicine-emerging or re-emerging ethical issues? A discussion of four ethical themes.
    Lenk C; Biller-Andorno N
    Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Jun; 10(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 16944265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Essentials of research ethics for healthcare professionals.
    Aita M; Richer MC
    Nurs Health Sci; 2005 Jun; 7(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 15877688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nanotechnology: the revolution of the big future with tiny medicine.
    Meetoo D
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Oct 22-Nov 11; 18(19):1201-6. PubMed ID: 19966748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
    Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research.
    Albert M; Laberge S; Hodges BD; Regehr G; Lingard L
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Jun; 66(12):2520-31. PubMed ID: 18336978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanomedicine and society.
    Ferrari M; Philibert MA; Sanhai WR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 May; 85(5):466-7. PubMed ID: 19381150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the perceptions of Iranian agricultural researchers towards nanotechnology.
    Hosseini SM; Rezaei R
    Public Underst Sci; 2011 Jul; 20(4):513-24. PubMed ID: 21936265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.