These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21507363)

  • 1. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.
    Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 21507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: insight from movement trajectory deviations.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 22133725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goal-directed movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus.
    Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jun; 119(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 15877977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aging and involuntary attention capture: electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age.
    Lien MC; Gemperle A; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 20973601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refining the time course of facilitation and inhibition in attention and action.
    Welsh TN; Neyedli H; Tremblay L
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Oct; 554():6-10. PubMed ID: 24012813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A demonstration of direct access to colored stimuli following cueing by color.
    Navon D; Kasten R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21621179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch.
    Miles E; Brown R; Poliakoff E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):871-88. PubMed ID: 20931419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paying attention to saccadic intrusions.
    Gowen E; Abadi RV; Poliakoff E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):810-25. PubMed ID: 16256318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning of reach-and-grasp movements: effects of validity and type of object information.
    Loukopoulos LD; Engelbrecht SF; Berthier NE
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Sep; 33(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 11495830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 17485166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining.
    Guzzon D; Brignani D; Miniussi C; Marzi CA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 20421095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience.
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.