180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21507558)
1. Compliance of Australian threatened species recovery plans with legislative requirements.
Ortega-Argueta A; Baxter G; Hockings M
J Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 92(8):2054-60. PubMed ID: 21507558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conceptual design of monitoring and evaluation plans for fish and wildlife in the Columbia River ecosystem.
Bisbal GA
Environ Manage; 2001 Oct; 28(4):433-53. PubMed ID: 11494064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.
Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the impact of the U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery planning guidelines on managing threats for listed species.
Troyer CM; Gerber LR
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1423-33. PubMed ID: 26108948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning.
Gregory R; Long G; Colligan M; Geiger JG; Laser M
J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 105():30-43. PubMed ID: 22516871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species.
Camaclang AE; Maron M; Martin TG; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):482-92. PubMed ID: 25472827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planning, implementing, and monitoring multiple-species habitat conservation plans.
Franklin J; Regan HM; Hierl LA; Deutschman DH; Johnson BS; Winchell CS
Am J Bot; 2011 Mar; 98(3):559-71. PubMed ID: 21613147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Addressing climate change threats to endangered species in U.S. recovery plans.
Povilitis A; Suckling K
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 20184656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conservation and management of the endangered Fiji sago palm, Metroxylon vitiense, in Fiji.
Morrison C; Rounds I; Watling D
Environ Manage; 2012 May; 49(5):929-41. PubMed ID: 22441695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing the impact of conservation projects.
Dietz LA; Brown M; Swaminathan V
Am J Primatol; 2010 May; 72(5):425-40. PubMed ID: 20095023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
Himes Boor GK
Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide.
Borja A; Bricker SB; Dauer DM; Demetriades NT; Ferreira JG; Forbes AT; Hutchings P; Jia X; Kenchington R; Carlos Marques J; Zhu C
Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Sep; 56(9):1519-37. PubMed ID: 18715596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis.
Murphy DD; Weiland PS
Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 21161526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife.
Marsh H; Dennis A; Hines H; Kutt A; McDonald K; Weber E; Williams S; Winter J
Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):387-99. PubMed ID: 17391189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.
Drummond SP; Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Watts M; Dennis R; Christy L; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 19843123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting recovery criteria for threatened and endangered plant species on the basis of past abundances and biological traits.
Neel MC; Che-Castaldo JP
Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 23293869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The need to rationalize and prioritize threatening processes used to determine threat status in the IUCN Red List.
Hayward MW
Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1568-76. PubMed ID: 19508675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
