202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21507617)
1. How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of "scientific quality" or "scientific productivity"?
von Bohlen Und Halbach O
Ann Anat; 2011 May; 193(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 21507617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact factor and other indices to assess science, scientists and scientific journals.
Satyanarayana K
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010; 54(3):197-212. PubMed ID: 21409860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production].
Gensini GF; Conti AA
Ann Ital Med Int; 1999; 14(2):130-3; discussion 134-5. PubMed ID: 10399377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [New bibliometric indicators. Is this the end of the impact factor era?].
Berhidi A; Szluka P; Vasas L
Magy Onkol; 2009 Jun; 53(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 19581177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].
Donato HM; De Oliveira CF
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 17234084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Approximation to the impact of biomedical journals in neurological sciences: study of bibliometric indicators in the Journal Citation Reports-Science Citation Index 2006].
Gonzalez de Dios J; Valderrama-Zurian JC; Gonzalez-Alcaide G; Sempere AP; Bolanos-Pizarro M; Aleixandre-Benavent R
Rev Neurol; 2009 Feb 1-15; 48(3):117-28. PubMed ID: 19206058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bibliometric indicators: a snapshot of the scientific productivity of leading European PRM researchers.
Franchignoni F; Muñoz Lasa S; Ozçakar L; Ottonello M
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Sep; 47(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 21946402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of citation indicators to identify and support high-quality research in Poland.
Pilc A
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 19043671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The long pilgrimage of Spanish biomedical journals toward excellence. Who helps? Quality, impact and research merit].
Alfonso F
Endocrinol Nutr; 2010 Mar; 57(3):110-20. PubMed ID: 20347618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Citation count as an international impact of scientific work and measure of individual influence on the development of a scientific field in Croatia].
Granić D
Lijec Vjesn; 1998; 120(10-11):309-14. PubMed ID: 19658345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Productivity and visibility of Cuban neuroscientists: bibliometric study of the period 2001-2005].
Dorta-Contreras AJ; Arencibia-Jorge R; Martí-Lahera Y; Araujo-Ruiz JA
Rev Neurol; 2008 Oct 1-15; 47(7):355-60. PubMed ID: 18841546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Confusing the confused: thoughts on impact factor, h(irsch) index, Q value, and other cofactors that influence the researcher's happiness].
Quindós G
Rev Iberoam Micol; 2009 Jun; 26(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19631157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Scientific literature: bibliometric and bibliographic indicators as integrative criteria for an objective evaluation of research activity].
Dracos A; Cognetti G
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1995; 31(3):381-90. PubMed ID: 8712583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Anales Españoles de Pediatría 2001. Bibliometric indicators of scientific quality].
González de Dios J
An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Aug; 57(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 12139870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical Hypotheses 2006 impact factor rises to 1.3--a vindication of the 'editorial review' system for revolutionary science.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(5):967-9. PubMed ID: 17706892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama].
La Torre G; Sciarra I; Chiappetta M; Monteduro A
Clin Ter; 2017; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.
Moed HF
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19219533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods].
Seglen PO
Nord Med; 1989; 104(12):331-5, 341. PubMed ID: 2594499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Bibliometric indicators for evaluation of research work. 2. Citations and their analysis].
Petrak J
Lijec Vjesn; 2001; 123(5-6):129-34. PubMed ID: 11554113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication.
Durieux V; Gevenois PA
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 20413749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
