148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21507752)
21. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Scatterer size estimation in pulse-echo ultrasound using focused sources: calibration measurements and phantom experiments.
Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):594-602. PubMed ID: 15296019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of a bistatic scattering substitution technique for calibration of focused receivers.
Rich KT; Mast TD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):EL469-73. PubMed ID: 26627816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 3-D H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging and Use of a Convolutional Neural Network for Scatterer Size Estimation.
Tai H; Khairalseed M; Hoyt K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 46(10):2810-2818. PubMed ID: 32653207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of Homodyned K Distribution Modeling Ultrasonic Speckles from Scatterers with Varying Spatial Organizations.
Hu X; Zhang Y; Deng L; Cai G; Zhang Q; Zhou Y; Zhang K; Zhang J
J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():8154780. PubMed ID: 29312656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temperature dependent ultrasonic characterization of biological media.
Ghoshal G; Luchies AC; Blue JP; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2203-11. PubMed ID: 21973375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Method of improved scatterer size estimation and application to parametric imaging using ultrasound.
Oelze ML; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3053-63. PubMed ID: 12509028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Limitations on estimation of effective scatterer diameters.
Zhu Y; Han A; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML; Insana MF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):3677. PubMed ID: 29289076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of cell spatial organization and size distribution on ultrasound backscattering.
Saha RK; Kolios MC
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2118-31. PubMed ID: 21989875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Window-modulated compounding Nakagami imaging for ultrasound tissue characterization.
Tsui PH; Ma HY; Zhou Z; Ho MC; Lee YH
Ultrasonics; 2014 Aug; 54(6):1448-59. PubMed ID: 24835004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional impedance map analysis of rabbit liver.
Pawlicki AD; Dapore AJ; Sarwate S; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL334-8. PubMed ID: 22088037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ; Madsen EL; Varghese T; Kliewer MA; Panda S; Lowery C; Barnes S
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4169-83. PubMed ID: 18635893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.
Luchies AC; Oelze ML
Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 25189857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterization of thyroid cancer in mouse models using high-frequency quantitative ultrasound techniques.
Lavarello RJ; Ridgway WR; Sarwate SS; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2333-41. PubMed ID: 24035621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
Rubert N; Varghese T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Beamforming effects on generalized Nakagami imaging.
Yu X; Guo Y; Huang SM; Li ML; Lee WN
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7513-31. PubMed ID: 26371543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improved scatterer size estimation using backscatter coefficient measurements with coded excitation and pulse compression.
Kanzler SG; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4599-607. PubMed ID: 18537407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Simulation of ultrasonic scattering from scatterer size distributions using Field II.
Whitson HM; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hale JH; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Feb; 155(2):1406-1421. PubMed ID: 38364040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
