These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21507752)

  • 41. Experimental assessment of spectrum analysis of ultrasonic echoes as a method for estimating scatterer properties.
    Hosokawa T; Sigel B; Machi J; Kitamura H; Kolecki RV; Justin JR; Feleppa EJ; Tuszynski G; Kakegawa T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 7941103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by using a reference phantom.
    Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3232-8. PubMed ID: 21110618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
    Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. 3-D H-scan ultrasound imaging of relative scatterer size using a matrix array transducer and sparse random aperture compounding.
    Tai H; Basavarajappa L; Hoyt K
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt B):106316. PubMed ID: 36442278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Scatterer reconstruction and parametrization of homogeneous tissue for ultrasound image simulation.
    Mattausch O; Goksel O
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():6350-3. PubMed ID: 26737745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Improved parametric imaging of scatterer size estimates using angular compounding.
    Gerig AL; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jun; 51(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 15244284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mean scatterer spacing estimation using multi-taper coherence.
    Rubert N; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jun; 60(6):1061-73. PubMed ID: 25004470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. 3D printed calibration micro-phantoms for super-resolution ultrasound imaging validation.
    Ommen ML; Schou M; Beers C; Jensen JA; Larsen NB; Thomsen EV
    Ultrasonics; 2021 Jul; 114():106353. PubMed ID: 33721683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fine-tuning the H-scan for discriminating changes in tissue scatterers.
    Parker KJ; Baek J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045012. PubMed ID: 33444273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.
    Lavarello RJ; Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2903-11. PubMed ID: 21568393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the spectral fit algorithm as functions of frequency range and deltakaeff.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):2003-10. PubMed ID: 16422412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A study on understanding the physical mechanism of change in ultrasonic envelope statistical property during temperature elevation.
    Omura M; Takeuchi M; Nagaoka R; Hasegawa H
    Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3042-3054. PubMed ID: 33880793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Subresolution Displacements in Finite Difference Simulations of Ultrasound Propagation and Imaging.
    Pinton GF
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Mar; 64(3):537-543. PubMed ID: 27992333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Acoustic scattering by arbitrary distributions of disjoint, homogeneous cylinders or spheres.
    Hesford AJ; Astheimer JP; Waag RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2883-93. PubMed ID: 21117739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Defining optimal axial and lateral resolution for estimating scatterer properties from volumes using ultrasound backscatter.
    Oelze ML; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3226-34. PubMed ID: 15237847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A simulation model for ultrasonic temperature imaging using change in backscattered energy.
    Trobaugh JW; Arthur RM; Straube WL; Moros EG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 17935869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A method for determination of frequency-dependent effective scatterer number density.
    Chen JF; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 8120267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of Signal Saturation on QUS Parameter Estimates Based on High-Frequency-Ultrasound Signals Acquired From Isolated Cancerous Lymph Nodes.
    Tamura K; Mamou J; Coron A; Yoshida K; Feleppa EJ; Yamaguchi T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Oct; 64(10):1501-1513. PubMed ID: 28796615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.