These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21508202)

  • 1. Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging.
    Sipilä O; Blomqvist P; Jauhiainen M; Kilpeläinen T; Malaska P; Mannila V; Vinnurva-Jussila T; Virsula S
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 21508202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound.
    Sipilä O; Mannila V; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 21144687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The automated assessment of ultrasound scanner lateral and slice thickness resolution: use of the step response.
    Rowland DE; Newey VR; Turner DP; Nassiri DK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1525-34. PubMed ID: 19560252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of the suitability of tissue phantoms for testing the constancy of ultrasonic transducer arrays in quality assurance.
    Rosenfeld E; Wolter S; Kopp A; Liebscher E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 22576698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Daily quality assurance phantom for ultrasound image guided radiation therapy.
    Drever L; Hilts M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 8(3):126-136. PubMed ID: 17712304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beam width measurements in low acoustic velocity phantoms.
    Goldstein A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 15063524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a low-cost liquid ultrasound test object for detection of transducer artefacts.
    King DM; Hangiandreou NJ; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):N557-70. PubMed ID: 21081828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis and evaluation of a novel quality assurance device for ultrasonic medical imaging systems.
    Hah Z; Naum R
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2345-52. PubMed ID: 18986883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma using a standardized phantom and standard clinical images: a 3-year national investigation in Korea.
    Choi JI; Jung SE; Kim PN; Cha SH; Jun JK; Lee HY; Park EC
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jun; 33(6):985-95. PubMed ID: 24866605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality control in ultrasonography].
    Meuwly JY
    Ther Umsch; 1997 Jan; 54(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9064797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance of brachytherapy afterloaders using a multi-slit phantom.
    Kohr P; Siebert FA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):N387-91. PubMed ID: 17762074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom.
    Sande EP; Martinsen AC; Hole EO; Olerud HM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5123-35. PubMed ID: 20714048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program.
    Hangiandreou NJ; Stekel SF; Tradup DJ; Gorny KR; King DM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1350-7. PubMed ID: 21683511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Approaches to objective assessment of differences in tissue textures by ultrasound equipment as a contribution to quality assurance].
    Bleck JS; Gebel M; Satrapa JD; Caselitz M; Westhoff-Bleck M; Wagner S; Manns M
    Ultraschall Med; 1997 Dec; 18(6):238-43. PubMed ID: 9491488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of extended field of view and dual image ultrasound techniques: accuracy and reliability of distance measurements in phantom study.
    Ying M; Sin MH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15653233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical and technical quality assurance in the CHARTWEL-Bronchus trial.
    Lehmann D; Leetz HK; Hodapp N; Voigtmann Dagger L; Herrmann T; Baumann M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Mar; 179(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 12627257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assurance of ultrasound systems: current status and review of literature.
    Grazhdani H; David E; Ventura Spagnolo O; Buemi F; Perri A; Orsogna N; Gigli S; Chimenz R
    J Ultrasound; 2018 Sep; 21(3):173-182. PubMed ID: 29949119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Automated quality control of ultrasonic B-mode scanners by applying an TMM 3D cyst phantom].
    Satrapa J; Schultz HJ; Doblhoff G
    Ultraschall Med; 2006 Jun; 27(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 16767616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.