These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21508202)

  • 41. [Metrological problems in testing medical ultrasound equipment].
    Eniakov AM
    Med Tekh; 2001; (3):20-1. PubMed ID: 11515262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quality assurance program for neonatal screening of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.
    Chiang SH; Wu KF; Liu TT; Wu SJ; Hsiao KJ
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():130-4. PubMed ID: 15906716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ultrasound transducer function: annual testing is not sufficient.
    Mårtensson M; Olsson M; Brodin LÅ
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Oct; 11(9):801-5. PubMed ID: 20530601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Method of Correcting for the Effect of Temperature on Low-Contrast Penetration Measurement in Urethane Phantoms.
    Peake E; Warrington S; Dudley NJ; Morgan PS; Gibson NM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1483-1488. PubMed ID: 30967319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Key performance parameters of a contemporary diagnostic ultrasound transducer.
    Moore GW
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2010; 44(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 20715353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The use of urethane rubber phantoms in ultrasound quality assurance measurements.
    Goldstein A
    J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Dec; 19(12):882. PubMed ID: 11127015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Obstetric ultrasound quality improvement initiative-utilization of a quality assurance process and standardized checklists.
    Mrazek-Pugh B; Blumenfeld YJ; Lee HC; Chueh J
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 May; 32(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 25730132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.
    Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 29322614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Quality assurance of ultrasound imaging systems for target localization and online setup corrections.
    Tomé WA; Orton NP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S53-6. PubMed ID: 18406938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development and implementation of a quality control protocol for B-mode ultrasound equipment.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Triantopoulou SS; Triantopoulou C
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Jun; 25(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 33834366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quality assurance of ultrasound imaging instruments by monitoring the monitor.
    Walker JB; Thorne GC; Halliwell M
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Nov; 38(11):1601-9. PubMed ID: 8272435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [The dilemma of data flood - reducing costs and increasing quality control].
    Gassmann B
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2012 Sep; 101(18):1197-202. PubMed ID: 22945822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices.
    Browne JE
    Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):742-51. PubMed ID: 25212384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How perfect are you with defective probes? Information on the results of the mini-trial on technical quality assurance during the "Ultraschall 2012" conference in Davos.
    Rosenfeld E; Jenderka KV; Kopp A; Keim V
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 23558398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality assurance for grey-scale imaging.
    Madsen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26 Suppl 1():S48-50. PubMed ID: 10794874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [A testing device for quality assurance of 3D-ultrasound equipment].
    Kollmann C; Bergmann H; Trabold T; Zotz R
    Z Med Phys; 2001; 11(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 11487859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures. Report of AAPM Ultrasound Task Group No. 1.
    Goodsitt MM; Carson PL; Witt S; Hykes DL; Kofler JM
    Med Phys; 1998 Aug; 25(8):1385-406. PubMed ID: 9725125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance tests of Doppler ultrasound equipment with a string phantom.
    Goldstein A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1991 Mar; 10(3):125-39. PubMed ID: 2027183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comment on "Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures" [Med. Phys. 25, 1385-1406 (1998)].
    Goldstein A
    Med Phys; 1998 Aug; 25(8):1547-54. PubMed ID: 9725145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Phantom-based quality assurance measurements in B-mode ultrasound.
    Mannila V; Sipilä O
    Acta Radiol Short Rep; 2013; 2(8):2047981613511967. PubMed ID: 24349715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.