These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21508754)

  • 1. Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications.
    Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Cohen SL; Wright KN; Shah NT; Chavan N; Einarsson JI
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 117(5):1142-1149. PubMed ID: 21508754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
    Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
    JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes.
    Scalici J; Laughlin BB; Finan MA; Wang B; Rocconi RP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 136(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 25462206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inpatient Hospital Costs and Route of Hysterectomy for Management of Benign Uterine Disease in the 90-Day Global Billing Period.
    Bauer HH; Sahmoud A; Rhodes SP; Sheyn D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 144(2):266-274. PubMed ID: 38870524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
    Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in operative time and outcomes in minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2008 to 2018.
    Luchristt D; Brown O; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):202.e1-202.e12. PubMed ID: 32791126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Smorgick N; Patzkowsky KE; Hoffman MR; Advincula AP; Song AH; As-Sanie S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 289(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 23839534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in readmission rate by route of hysterectomy - a single-center experience.
    Kreuninger JA; Cohen SL; Meurs EAIM; Cox M; Vitonis A; Jansen FW; Einarsson JI
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Mar; 97(3):285-293. PubMed ID: 29192965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Woelk JL; Borah BJ; Trabuco EC; Heien HC; Gebhart JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 123(2 Pt 1):255-262. PubMed ID: 24402586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value-based assessment of hysterectomy approaches.
    Danilyants N; MacKoul P; Baxi R; van der Does LQ; Haworth LR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):389-398. PubMed ID: 30402927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.
    Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T
    JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.