These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2150978)

  • 1. Influence of cavosurface configuration and composite resin type on impact fracture resistance of Class IV restorations.
    Smith RL; Hood JA; Stokes AN
    N Z Dent J; 1990 Jul; 86(385):58-61. PubMed ID: 2150978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Margin designs and fracture resistance of incisal resin composite restorations.
    Tan DE; Tjan AH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 1524737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Class IV preparation design for microfilled and macrofilled composite resin.
    Donly KJ; Browning R
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1502113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
    Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct composite resin restoration of an anterior tooth: effect of fiber-reinforced composite substructure.
    Garoushi SK; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 17645066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11764835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polymerisation shrinkage around composite resin restorations--an in vitro study.
    Botha CT; de Wet FA
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1994 May; 49(5):201-7. PubMed ID: 9508937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.